KSU JADI KAMBING HITAM

Menurut laporan berita petang tadi, Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Perdagangan Dalam Negeri dan Hal Ehwal Pengguna, Hasnol Zam Zam Ahmad telah dilantik menjadi Pengerusi Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia atau SSM.

Perlantikan beliau selama dua tahun berkuatkuasa 1 April 2020.

Disebutkan juga bahawa watikah pelantikan itu telah diserahkan kepada beliau oleh Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri dan Hal Ehwal Pengguna, Datuk Alexander Nanta Linggi pada 1 April yang lalu.

Bagaimanapun, berita pertukaran Hasnol Zam Zam hanya disiarkan pada hari ini, 6 April 2020.

Untuk makluman, Hasnol Zam Zam adalah orang yang menandatangani surat membenarkan dua syarikat arak, Heineken dan Carlsberg meneruskan operasi semasa PKP dikuatkuasakan sebagaimana suratnya itu telah tersebar luas di media sosial sejak dua hari lalu.

Dalam surat tersebut, beliau didapati menandatanganinya sebagai Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Perdagangan Dalam Negeri dan Hal Ehwal Pengguna dengan masing-masing bertarikh 31 Mac 2020 dan 4 April 2020.

Begitu pun, berikutan bantahan ramai netizen di media sosial, mesyuarat khas kabinet yang dipengerusikan Muhyiddin Yassin hari ini, 6 April 2020, telah membatalkan surat kebenaran beroperasi kepada dua kilang arak tersebut.

Alasan yang diberi ialah kebenaran itu tidak selari dengan dasar kerajaan sewaktu PKP dikuatkuasakan serta juga dikatakan Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri dan Hal Ehwal, Alexander Nanti Linggi tidak tahu menahu mengenai kebenaran yang diberikan itu.

Adakah dengan pertukaran ini, bermakna Hasnol Zam Zam telah dijadikan kambing hitam?

Jika benar pertukarannya ke SSM berkuatkuasa 1 April lalu, mengapa baru hari ini ia diumumkan?

Kalau betul sudah ditukarkan ke SSM pada 1 April, bagaimana pula Hasnol Zam Zam masih boleh menandatangani salah surat atas jawatannya sebagai Ketua Setiausaha pada 4 April 2020?

Apakah oleh kerana isu kebenaran kilang arak beroperasi sewaktu PKP yang menjadi isu hangat sejak dua hari lalu dirasa telah mencemarkan nama kerajaan tebuk atap, maka Hasnol Zam Zam telah dijadikan kambing hitam dengan beliau segera dipindahkan (diturunkan pangkat) ke SSM, tetapi tarikh pertukarannya telah dikebelakangkan kepada 1 April 2020?

Itukah sebabnya pertukaran beliau hanya diumumkan hari ini? 

(ShahbudinHusin 06/04/2020)

Terrorist Hadi Wrote A Letter To Scam The Muslim World – Here’s Why The Arab Leaders Would Probably Laugh At Him

THE FINANCETWITTER.COM

The simple fact that Muhyiddin Yassin refused to promote Hadi Awang as either the deputy prime minister or a religious affairs minister shows the deep distrust the prime minister has on the PAS president, whose Islamic extremism and radicalization would do more damage than good to the fragile backdoor Perikatan Nasional government.

In reality, there aren’t many ministries that PAS president Hadi is qualified to lead. The Religious Affairs Ministry unexpectedly went to Zulkifli Mohamad Al-Bakri, a non politician but a Federal Territories mufti (religious scholar) who is popularly known for his moderate approaches and positive interfaith attitude. That was indeed a huge slap in the face of Hadi Awang.

Disappointed, the PAS supremo went into hiding for almost a month – sulking. To prevent the backdoor government from a sudden collapse during the current Coronavirus pandemic, the prime minister had reluctantly appointed him as Special Envoy to the Middle East to pacify his followers and to allow him to regain some dignity, even though it will be months before he can travel to the region.

The position as special envoy itself smells fishy. The scope of his coverage – Middle East – might sound very powerful to the simpleton Hadi, but it could also mean a generic term because the prime minister had no idea where to assign him. It was like giving him a powerful title, but in reality, a general office clerk responsible for unimportant administrative tasks.

Muhyiddin has been sending warlords whom he considers as threats to as far as possible. He sent Hishammuddin Hussein to take care of foreign affairs. And he appointed Khairy Jamaluddin as Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, clearly an irrelevant and useless ministry. And now he sends terrorist Hadi Awang to the Middle East to be grilled.

Yes, as far as Saudi Arabia and his buddies (United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Egypt) are concerned, Hadi Awang is still regarded as a terrorist by virtue of him as one of the four vice-presidents of Qatar-based International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), an organization which Saudi, the de-facto leader of the Middle East, has banned and categorised as a “terrorist organization”.

Therefore, in order to justify his new position as special envoy to the region, the PAS president had written a letter in Arabic to all Muslim leaders worldwide. So far, the Islamist party has neither denied the existence nor the authentication of the contents of the letter, lending credence that the letter signed by Hadi Awang himself was indeed genuine.

The letter was designed to scam Saudi – de-facto leader of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) – as well as to legitimize the backdoor government of Muhyiddin. In a nutshell, the letter tried to impress upon the leaders of the Middle East that Muhyiddin’s Perikatan Nasional government is more Islamic than the previous Mahathir’s Pakatan Harapan government.

In the letter, Hadi claimed that his Islamist party had met, discussed and chosen to cooperate with then-PM Mahathir Mohamad because the 94-year-old man was a bigger champion of Islam. In the same breath, Hadi rejected PM-in-waiting Anwar Ibrahim due to his questionable personal character as well as his dangerous political pragmatism.

How did Hadi conclude that Mahathir was a better defender of Islam than Anwar? Was it due to Mahathir’s harbouring of Indian Muslim hate preacher Zakir Naik? Or was it because Mahathir had generously gifted RM400 million to the PAS-ruled state of Kelantan, which brought cheer to PAS top leaders who then happily rewarded themselves with a fleet of 14 Mercedes Benz and RM50,000 bonus each?

During Mahathir’s 22 years iron-fist rule (from 1981 to 2003), and even during his retirement period, he had consistently warned his (former) party UMNO of the grave repercussions of supporting PAS’ agenda to implement hudud punishments in Kelantan. Heck, he had even warned that “Hudud Law” proposed by PAS was unjust and against Islamic principles.

Hence, either PAS has been a fake and unjust Islamist party or Mahathir was not such a pro-Islam leader – take your pick. Amusingly, neither Hadi nor Mahathir talked about introducing hudud law nationwide at all during the so-called meetings or discussions from May 2018 to March 2020, when the Pakatan Harapan government eventually collapsed due to Muhyiddin’s coup.

Mr. Hadi’s questioning of Anwar’s personal character is presumably linked to the latter’s sodomy conviction, leading to his jail sentence. But Anwar had officially been pardoned by former Agong (King), Sultan Muhammad V of Kelantan. Is Hadi trying to mock, belittle and insult the intelligence of the Malay Ruler and the Monarch Institution with his hateful letter to the Muslim leaders worldwide?

More importantly, the “munafiq” (hypocrite) Hadi conveniently hides the fact in the letter that the Muhyiddin’s backdoor government of which his party is part of has willingly worked with Azmin Ali, the traitor who did not only betray his own PKR party, but was also caught with his pants down engaging in “gay sex” at Four Points Sheraton Hotel in Sandakan, Sabah.

The extremist Hadi also wrote that Pakatan Harapan’s stunning victory in the May 2018 General Election had benefited or sided with the non-Muslims, obviously referring to multi-racial but Chinese-dominated DAP party. He falsely claimed that Mahathir had been used as a stepping stone to achieve power, largely due to Mahathir’s old age as well as treachery committed.

In truth, before the Pakatan Harapan government collapsed due to treachery committed by Muhyiddin Yassin and Azmin Ali, the coalition consisted of PKR, Amanah, Bersatu and DAP. Only DAP was dominated by Chinese or non-Muslim. How was the Pakatan Harapan different from the now-defunct Pakatan Rakyat, which comprised PKR, DAP and PAS

The simple fact that Muhyiddin Yassin refused to promote Hadi Awang as either the deputy prime minister or a religious affairs minister shows the deep distrust the prime minister has on the PAS president, whose Islamic extremism and radicalization would do more damage than good to the fragile backdoor Perikatan Nasional government.

In reality, there aren’t many ministries that PAS president Hadi is qualified to lead. The Religious Affairs Ministry unexpectedly went to Zulkifli Mohamad Al-Bakri, a non politician but a Federal Territories mufti (religious scholar) who is popularly known for his moderate approaches and positive interfaith attitude. That was indeed a huge slap in the face of Hadi Awang.

Disappointed, the PAS supremo went into hiding for almost a month – sulking. To prevent the backdoor government from a sudden collapse during the current Coronavirus pandemic, the prime minister had reluctantly appointed him as Special Envoy to the Middle East to pacify his followers and to allow him to regain some dignity, even though it will be months before he can travel to the region.

The position as special envoy itself smells fishy. The scope of his coverage – Middle East – might sound very powerful to the simpleton Hadi, but it could also mean a generic term because the prime minister had no idea where to assign him. It was like giving him a powerful title, but in reality, a general office clerk responsible for unimportant administrative tasks.

Muhyiddin has been sending warlords whom he considers as threats to as far as possible. He sent Hishammuddin Hussein to take care of foreign affairs. And he appointed Khairy Jamaluddin as Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, clearly an irrelevant and useless ministry. And now he sends terrorist Hadi Awang to the Middle East to be grilled.

Yes, as far as Saudi Arabia and his buddies (United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Egypt) are concerned, Hadi Awang is still regarded as a terrorist by virtue of him as one of the four vice-presidents of Qatar-based International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), an organization which Saudi, the de-facto leader of the Middle East, has banned and categorised as a “terrorist organization”.

Therefore, in order to justify his new position as special envoy to the region, the PAS president had written a letter in Arabic to all Muslim leaders worldwide. So far, the Islamist party has neither denied the existence nor the authentication of the contents of the letter, lending credence that the letter signed by Hadi Awang himself was indeed genuine.

The letter was designed to scam Saudi – de-facto leader of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) – as well as to legitimize the backdoor government of Muhyiddin. In a nutshell, the letter tried to impress upon the leaders of the Middle East that Muhyiddin’s Perikatan Nasional government is more Islamic than the previous Mahathir’s Pakatan Harapan government.

In the letter, Hadi claimed that his Islamist party had met, discussed and chosen to cooperate with then-PM Mahathir Mohamad because the 94-year-old man was a bigger champion of Islam. In the same breath, Hadi rejected PM-in-waiting Anwar Ibrahim due to his questionable personal character as well as his dangerous political pragmatism.

How did Hadi conclude that Mahathir was a better defender of Islam than Anwar? Was it due to Mahathir’s harbouring of Indian Muslim hate preacher Zakir Naik? Or was it because Mahathir had generously gifted RM400 million to the PAS-ruled state of Kelantan, which brought cheer to PAS top leaders who then happily rewarded themselves with a fleet of 14 Mercedes Benz and RM50,000 bonus each?

During Mahathir’s 22 years iron-fist rule (from 1981 to 2003), and even during his retirement period, he had consistently warned his (former) party UMNO of the grave repercussions of supporting PAS’ agenda to implement hudud punishments in Kelantan. Heck, he had even warned that “Hudud Law” proposed by PAS was unjust and against Islamic principles.

Hence, either PAS has been a fake and unjust Islamist party or Mahathir was not such a pro-Islam leader – take your pick. Amusingly, neither Hadi nor Mahathir talked about introducing hudud law nationwide at all during the so-called meetings or discussions from May 2018 to March 2020, when the Pakatan Harapan government eventually collapsed due to Muhyiddin’s coup.

Mr. Hadi’s questioning of Anwar’s personal character is presumably linked to the latter’s sodomy conviction, leading to his jail sentence. But Anwar had officially been pardoned by former Agong (King), Sultan Muhammad V of Kelantan. Is Hadi trying to mock, belittle and insult the intelligence of the Malay Ruler and the Monarch Institution with his hateful letter to the Muslim leaders worldwide?

More importantly, the “munafiq” (hypocrite) Hadi conveniently hides the fact in the letter that the Muhyiddin’s backdoor government of which his party is part of has willingly worked with Azmin Ali, the traitor who did not only betray his own PKR party, but was also caught with his pants down engaging in “gay sex” at Four Points Sheraton Hotel in Sandakan, Sabah.

The extremist Hadi also wrote that Pakatan Harapan’s stunning victory in the May 2018 General Election had benefited or sided with the non-Muslims, obviously referring to multi-racial but Chinese-dominated DAP party. He falsely claimed that Mahathir had been used as a stepping stone to achieve power, largely due to Mahathir’s old age as well as treachery committed.

In truth, before the Pakatan Harapan government collapsed due to treachery committed by Muhyiddin Yassin and Azmin Ali, the coalition consisted of PKR, Amanah, Bersatu and DAP. Only DAP was dominated by Chinese or non-Muslim. How was the Pakatan Harapan different from the now-defunct Pakatan Rakyat, which comprised PKR, DAP and PAS?

Yes, the same Hadi Awang was previously part of the opposition Pakatan Rakyat coalition who had tried – and failed – to topple the previous Barisan Nasional government in the 2008 and 2013 General Elections. Had the Pakatan Rakyat succeeded in unseating Barisan Nasional, would not DAP be part of a new government too? Would Hadi still spew racial and religious hatred?

According to Hadi’s twisted logic, the Pakatan Harapan (PKR, Amanah, Bersatu and DAP) had diluted the power and influence of Muslims, but the Pakatan Rakyat (PKR, PAS and DAP) would not dilute the power and influence of Muslims. In other words, as long as PAS is part of the government, even if DAP tagged along, the Muslims will be fine and will not lose power.

If indeed it was true that the old and senile Mahathir had been used, then it’s also true that the non-Muslim DAP had committed treachery in sponsoring the KL Summit 2019, the platform which Hadi used to express his strong support and opened his toxic mouth, slamming Saudi for its failure to protect Muslims worldwide in its capacity as leader of OIC.

Without fail, the letter composed by Hadi condemned Amanah, the splinter party of PAS, as secular liberals whose support was derived from Western countries for strategies, media and finances. He profusely defended the formation of backdoor government Perikatan Nasional as being democratic and constitutional. Is that true?

Sure, Muhyiddin’s government might be constitutional, but it was definitely not formed through the ballot box, hence it’s known as a backdoor government created through a coup and treachery – not democratically. Otherwise, how does Hadi explain that with the exception of Singapore and Indonesia, not a single foreign country has endorsed or recognised the new regime?

Embarrassingly, not a single Arab country in the Middle East has sent a congratulatory note to newly crowned Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin. Thus, it begs the same question – will Special Envoy Hadi Awang be recognised by the Middle East governments? Does Hadi really think the Middle East gives a damn whether Perikatan Nasional is constitutional and democratic?

Saudi and its friends are more concerned about Hadi’s credential as a terrorist who had openly admitted that he would choose Qatar, Turkey and Iran over other Arab powers in the Middle East. Hadi Awang, like Anwar Ibrahim, is a strong supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood, a Sunni Islamist organization that gave birth to “Arab Spring”. Threatened, Saudi government then declared Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.

To make matters worse, the snatching of power – a coup – demonstrated by Muhyiddin Yassin (Bersatu), Zahid Hamidi (UMNO) and Hadi Awang (PAS) in the infamous “Sheraton move” has not gone down well with the Arab world. The coup is seen as a threat to the Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and other Gulf states that practises authoritarian rule.

It was quite funny that Hadi has proudly – but foolishly – aligned himself with Mahathir Mohamad in his half-baked letter. Did he realise that under Mahathir administration, Malaysia had pulled out its troops from Saudi Arabia, which was deployed to the kingdom in 2015 by scandal-plagued PM Najib Razak – illegally – without approval from the Cabinet, let alone Parliament?

Mahathir had also condemned the brutal assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, describing it as an act of “extreme cruelty” and unacceptable. The CIA has concluded that the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had given the order for the killing, where the Saudi Arabian dissident was butchered and his body was dismembered and disposed of.

Hadi Awang, whose favourite pastime is playing religious bigotry and racial extremism thought he was smart when he wrote that Muhyiddin government had defeated opposing movement who had help from Western Ambassadors and Freemason and Zionist advisors. He was trying to fan the flames of racial hatred against the Americans and Israeli.

Jared Kushner, an observant Jew and a top adviser to his father-in-law, President Donald Trump, is close friends with the Saudi Crown Prince. Trump is throwing its weight behind Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. Egypt and Jordan already host Israeli embassies and maintain open security and political ties. Even Saudi Crown Prince had secretly paid a visit to Israel.

In August 2018, the UAE paid the secretive Israeli NSO Group to spy on dissidents. Two months later, Netanyahu visited Oman. The Warsaw Summit saw smiles and handshakes exchanged between foreign ministers of the UAE, Bahrain and other Arab states with Netanyahu. Even Qatar has working arrangements with Israel for years already.

Images of the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, smiling and joking with Arab leaders at the international conference on the Middle East were possible because the Arab world and Israel has a common enemy – Iran. Yes, while the relationship between the Gulf states and Israel is increasingly getting closer, the dumb Hadi Awang tried to badmouth the Israel in front of the Arabs.

The best part was Hadi Awang, a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood and Iranian regime, didn’t realise that the Sunni Arabs in the Middle East hate Iran more than Israel or America. The reason Hadi wrote a lengthy letter to the Muslim world is to trick them into believing that Muhyiddin did not launch a coup or revolution hence the backdoor government deserves recognition from the Middle East.

Like it or not, the letter to mislead the Muslim world will not only backfire but would most probably be laughed at. Perhaps Hadi Awang, with his “IQ of a carrot”, is still clueless as to the damage he has inflicted with his letter. The letter begging the Middle East to believe that Muhyiddin government is legitimate is itself an admission that the backdoor government is illegitimate.

Sidang Media Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia 06/04/2020

WAKTU PH PERINTAH, BENDA BELUM BERLAKU LAGI LEBAI-LEBAI DAH MENYALAK...

Bila rakyat komen bertalu-bertalu berkaitan kilang arak yang dibenarkan beroperasi, barulah timbul suara Dr Maza. Dia lambat nak komen sebab sibuk mengampu kerajaan pintu belakang.

Lebai-lebai pun baru nak komen..lembab jugak. Zaman PH dulu, benda belum berlaku lagi mereka dah hentam awal. Contohnya, ICERD. UEC, tulisan jawi, pesta arak, belum pun berlaku mereka dah menyalak. Walhal memang kerajaan PH tak buat pun.

Sekarang, dah dah ada surat kelulusan buka kilang arak di waktu PKP, para lebai buat aman je main telo....dah kecuh baru nak buka kitab.

WFAUZDIN NS

KKM..TAHNIAH..KEKALKAN ..DUDUK DIRUMAH

HEBAT KERAJAAN KUARANTIN

PUZIAH SAAD


Hebat kerajaan kurantin yang balik oversea dihotel 5 bintang selama 14 hari... Golden Horses Hilton miliinium.Gaji dan elaun-elaun doktor nurses dan frontlines ada tambahan ke
Mereka yang bertungkus lumus mengawal wabak... tanya jer..

Rugilah mereka yang positif tapi qurantin dirumah jer..

Catatan ini mungkin boleh kerajaan .u turn

Ribut Hieneken landa negara

Oleh SITI NUR ZAWANI MISCONApril 6, 2020 5:43 pm

Timbalan Pengerusi AMANAH Selangor, Azli Yusof menggambarkan suasana ketika ini sebagai ribut ‘Hieneken’ yang sedang melanda negara.

Azli berkata, Perikatan Nasional (PN) yang dahulunya semasa menjadi pembangkang, riuh meminta Pakatan Harapan (PH) menutup kilang arak dan melarang anjuran Oktober Fest.

Namun katanya, selepas kuasa bertukar tangan, PN pula ibarat tidak sabar menunggu untuk menyambut ‘April Fest’ yang merujuk kepada kekecohan Hieneken pada ketika ini.

“Kementerian Perdagangan Dalam Negeri dan Hal Ehwal Pengguna (KPDNHEP) keluar surat kebenaran kilang arak beroperasi. Alasan kerana (ianya) bekalan keperluan sepanjang tempoh perintah PKP.

“Sempat salahkan PH, kenapa tak tutup kilang semasa berkuasa. Dah tak ada hujah, sebut lah apa pun penyedap kata,” katanya dalam satu kenyataan.

Azli turut membangkitkan, terdapat juga beberapa pihak yang cuba mendakwa surat kebenaran berkenaan tidak dapat dipastikan kesahihannya.

Namun katanya, akhirnya kerajaan membatalkan kebenaran tersebut atas alasan Menteri tidak tahu mengenai perkara tersebut.

“Nak salahkan Ketua Setiausaha kementerian lah tu. Menteri KPDNHEP masih tetap membisu.

“Inilah kerajaan PN yang tuan-tuan tak pilih. Ribut tak habis-habis,” katanya.

KINI PELUANG PAS USULKAN SEMULA RUU 355

Abdul Malek Hussein

Tepat dua tahun lalu, pada 5 April 2018, Dewan Rakyat ditangguhkan dan akan bersidang semula pada suatu tarikh selepas selesai PRU14.‬

‪Apa yang menjadi perhatian ramai dalam mesyuarat terakhir Parlimen Ketiga Belas pada hari itu ialah status usul persendirian MP Marang Abdul Hadi Awang bagi mendapat kebenaran Dewan Rakyat untuk mencadangkan Rang Undang-undang Mahkamah Syariah (Bidang Kuasa Jenayah) (Pindaan) 2016 atau lebih dikenali sebagai RUU355.‬

‪Usul persendirian itu mencadangkan Akta 355 dipinda bagi mengenakan hukuman lebih berat di bawah kuasa mahkamah syariah. Ia mahukan hukuman "penjara selama tempoh melebihi 3 tahun atau denda melebihi RM5,000 atau sebatan melebihi 6 kali" digantikan dengan "penjara selama tempoh melebihi 30 tahun atau denda melebihi RM100,000 atau sebatan 100 kali" bagi kes-kes jenayah Syariah.‬

‪Pada 24 November 2016, MP Marang membawa usul persendirian itu bagi kali pertama di Dewan Rakyat di bawah Peraturan Mesyuarat 49 (1).‬

‪Menurut Peraturan Mesyuarat, suatu usul persendirian bagi meminda apa-apa Akta perlu terlebih dahulu dibentang bagi mendapatkan kebenaran majlis mesyuarat Dewan.‬

‪Pada 26 Mei 2016, MP Marang membentangkan usul persendirian tersebut di Dewan Rakyat buat pertama kali dengan membacakan pindaan RUU 355 dalam versi baru yang dipinda lagi, tetapi pembentangan RUU 355 itu dan perbahasannya ditangguhkan.‬

‪Pada 6 April 2017, MP Marang diberi peluang sekali lagi membentangkan usul persendirian tersebut. Namun tiada keputusan dibuat oleh Dewan Rakyat bagi mempersetujui usul yang sepatutnya memberikan kebenaran kepada MP Marang untuk membentangkan pindaan Akta 355, dan sidang Dewan ditangguhkan tanpa sebarang keputusan.‬

‪Pada 5 April 2018, Kerajaan bentangkan usul yang menghadkan masa mesyuarat Dewan Rakyat hanya untuk menyelesaikan urusan kerajaan, tanpa memberi peluang usul persendirian MP Marang dibahaskan. Ahli-ahli Parlimen BN yang bermajoriti UMNO menyetujui usul tersebut, lalu sekali lagi tiada keputusan Dewan dicapai bagi membenarkan MP Marang mencadangkan RUU meminda Akta 355.‬

‪Menurut Peraturan Mesyuarat Dewan Rakyat, sesuatu usul persendirian seperti usul MP Marang bagi meminda Akta RUU 355 perlu mendapat persetujuan Dewan sebelum ianya boleh dijadikan usul RUU Kerajaan.‬

‪Menurut Peraturan Mesyuarat juga, hanya Kerajaan sahaja yang boleh membentang RUU yang baru atau yang meminda Akta yang sedia ada.‬

‪Sebarang pindaan Akta dari Ahli Parlimen bukan kerajaan hendaklah terlebih dahulu kemukakan usul persendirian untuk mendapat persetujuan Dewan. Tanpa persetujuan majlis mesyuarat Dewan, usul persendirian itu tak berbangkit dan tertolak dengan sendirinya apabila Dewan terhenti bersidang atau ditangguhkan atau Parlimen dibubarkan.‬

‪Pada hari Khamis, 5 April 2018, Menteri BN-UMNO di Jabatan Perdana Menteri kemukakan usul Dewan Rakyat hanya menyelesaikan urusan kerajaan. Dewan Rakyat terhenti tepat jam 1:00 tengahari, walaupun pada hari Khamis lazimnya Dewan bersidang sehingga jam 5:30 petang. Menurut kelaziman, masih ada masa selama 3 jam lagi untuk membahas dan memutuskan usul persendirian MP Marang.‬

‪Oleh kerana, Dewan Rakyat bagi Parlimen Ketiga Belas telah ditangguhkan, usul persendirian MP Marang itu tertolak dengan sendirinya dan tak berbangkit lagi.‬

‪Usul persendirian MP Marang bagi mendapat kebenaran untuk mencadangkan RUU meminda Akta 355 tidak mendapat persetujuan Dewan Rakyat. Ia tidak menjadi kenyataan kerana putar belit Yang di-Pertua Dewan Rakyat.‬

‪Usul persendirian MP Marang tidak lagi bertaraf Rang Undang-undang yang sepatutnya kemudian dikemukakan oleh Kerajaan Persekutuan pimpinan PM Najib Razak ketika itu dan dibahaskan dalam Dewan Rakyat. Ia tidak menjadi kenyataan akibat putar belit BN-UMNO yang menguasai majoriti dalam Dewan Rakyat.‬

‪PAS dan para penyokongnya di peringkat akar umbi menjadi mangsa putar pelit politik BN-UMNO, dan di samping itu nyata sekali wujud kesilapan perhitungan strategi pimpinan tertinggi PAS yang termakan umpan PM Najib Razak.‬

‪Dua hari kemudian, pada 7 April 2018, Parlimen dibubarkan bagi memberi laluan kepada PRU14. Dalam PRU14 yang diadakan 9 Mei 2018 itu, BN tewas dan Pakatan Harapan (PH) menang untuk membentuk Kerajaan Persekutuan.‬

‪Pindaan RUU 355 tak berbangkit sepanjang PH berkuasa kerana ia tidak menjadi agenda perjuangan PH.‬

‪Kerajaan PH tidak bertahan lama. Pada 24 Februari 2020, Kerajaan PH tumbang dan Perikatan Nasional (PN) merampas kuasa melalui pengkhianatan beberapa Ahli-ahli Parlimen Parti Keadilan Rakyat dan tindakan Bersatu keluar PH. ‬

‪Pada 9 Mac 2020, PM Muhyiddin Yassin mengumumkan Anggota Pentadbiran seramai 70 orang, termasuk 3 orang Menteri dan 5 Timbalan Menteri dari PAS.‬

Aku membangkitkan beberapa persoalan kini berkaitan pindaan Akta 355.

‪◾️Apakah kehadiran Menteri-menteri dan Timbalan-timbalan Menteri PAS akan lebih membuka peluang untuk mencadangkan dalam Kabinet Kerajaan PN bagi mempersetujui Rang Undang-undang meminda Akta 355 dibawa ke mesyuarat Parlimen yang akan bermula pada 18 Mei 2020?‬

‪◾️Atau, adakah dengan MP Kota Bharu, Takiyuddin Hassan yang kini Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri (Parlimen dan Undang-undang) pada kali ini akan mengemukakan usul Kerajaan bagi meminda Akta 355 dalam sidang Parlimen akan datang?‬

‪◾️Atau, apakah MP Marang, Haji Abdul Hadi Awang yang kini Duta Khas PM ke Timur Tengah bertaraf Menteri akan beliau sendiri membentangkan usul Kerajaan itu?‬

‪◾️Atau, apakah PAS akan menganjurkan satu lagi perhimpunan RUU 355 bagi mengenakan tekanan terhadap Kerajaan PN seperti yang pernah diadakan pada 18 Februari 2017 di Padang Merbok, Kuala Lumpur jika Kerajaan PN tidak bersetuju dengan pindaan itu?‬

‪◾️Atau, bersediakah PAS menarik diri daripada Kerajaan PM Muhyiddin Yassin sekiranya Kerajaan PN tidak mempunyai komitmen untuk meminda Akta 355?‬

‪◾️Atau, adakah PAS sendiri memutuskan untuk tidak lagi memperjuangkan pindaan Akta 355 kerana berkedudukan kerajaan kini lebih selesa dan tidak membawa keuntungan politik lagi jika isu RUU 355 dikemukakan kembali?‬

‪◾️Atau, adakah sebelum ini tuntutan PAS untuk meminda Akta 355 dahulu hanyalah suatu sandiwara politik yang cuma bertujuan mengabui untuk menarik sokongan undi orang-orang Melayu Islam dalam PRU14 sahaja?‬

‪Sesungguhnya, dua tahun lalu pada 5 April 2018, perjuangan PAS meminda Akta 355 tidak berupaya menjadi kenyataan. Tetapi kini PAS dalam Kerajaan Persekutuan. PAS mungkin tak berhalangan lagi untuk membawa dan menjadi pindaan itu suatu realiti.‬

‪🔴 Atau, mungkinkah RUU 355 kini telah meninggal dunia menjadi mangsa terbaru virus COVID-19?‬

VIDEO LIVE ANWAR BEBERAPA HARI LEPAS :DESAKAN DAN PANDANGAN ANWAR AGAR PKS DIBERI BANTUAN DITERIMA MUHYIDDIN

Muhyiddin umum peruntukan tambahan RM10 bilion bantu PKS

Faiz Zainudin

 -

April 6, 2020 4:09 PM

PETALING JAYA: Perdana Menteri, Muhyiddin Yassin mengumumkan peruntukan pakej perihatin tambahan sebanyak RM10 bilion bagi perusahaan kecil dan sederhana (PKS).

Dana tambahan itu dibuat bagi membantu kesukaran yang dialami oleh industri tersebut pada masa ini susulan penularan pandemik Covid-19,

“Diharap dalam membantu beban sektor PKS,” katanya dalam siaran langsung di televisyen hari ini.

Bantuan itu tambahan kepada pelan penyelamat Covid-19 RM250 bilion, atau Pakej Rangsangan Ekonomi Prihatin Rakyat, yang diumumkan Muhyiddin bulan lepas.

Ia terdiri daripada RM128 bilion untuk kebajikan rakyat, RM100 bilion bagi menyokong perniagaan dan RM2 bilion untuk memperkukuhkan ekonomi negara, selain RM20 bilion yang diumumkan dalam pakej terdahulu.

VIDEO SALLEHUDIN AYUB: Kesan PKP ke atas rantaian bekalan dikhuatiri cetus kekurangan makanan,SEBAB itu Salehuddin Ayub dah bagi tau awal

Ainaa Aiman

 -

April 6, 2020 2:51 PM

Pemborong mendakwa orang ramai kurang membeli makanan segar sepanjang pelaksanaan perintah kawalan pergerakan kerana mereka memilih untuk membeli barangan berjangka hayat lebih lama.

PETALING JAYA: Pemborong memberi amaran mengenai kekurangan bekalan makanan dengan berkata, pengedaran hasil segar terganggu berikutan pelaksanaan sekatan perjalanan di seluruh negara di bawah perintah kawalan pergerakan (PKP).

Peladang dan nelayan mengurangkan kapasiti pengeluaran kerana mereka tidak boleh menjual dengan banyak, menurut presiden Persatuan Pemborong Ikan Melayu untuk Wilayah Persekutuan dan Selangor, dan ketua Persatuan Pemborong Buah-buahan Kuala Lumpur.

Ibrahim Mohamad dari persatuan pemborong ikan berkata, sekatan perjalanan semasa menyukarkan orang tengah untuk mengedarkan ikan segar dan ramai pengedar serta pembekal runcit menghentikan operasi.

“Walaupun nelayan turun ke laut, ia tidak berguna. Mereka tidak boleh menjual ikan mereka.

“Sekiranya mereka berada di Terengganu, mungkin mereka boleh jual ikan ke kampung berhampiran. Tetapi jika mereka mendapat tangkapan besar dan mahu menghantarnya ke Kuala Lumpur, itu sukar, “katanya.

Oleh itu tambahnya, kebanyakan nelayan tidak pergi ke laut.

Beliau berkata, pemborong tidak menempah bekalan ikan yang banyak berikutan permintaan yang rendah daripada peniaga kecil, sementara permintaan untuk makanan segar juga berkurangan berikutan orang ramai memilih produk makanan dengan tarikh luput lebih lama.

Beliau berkata, jika pengurusan bekalan makanan tidak ditambah baik, ia akan menyebabkan kekurangan bekalan sekiranya PKP dilanjutkan.

“Pihak yang menghasilkan makanan memang ada, tetapi mereka tidak boleh edarkan berikutan sekatan yang dilaksanakan.”

Ibrahim menjual ikan secara pukal kepada peniaga, pasar raya dan kedai di Lembah Klang, Negeri Sembilan, Padang dan Melaka.

Katanya, walaupun dianggarkan bekalan ikan segar berkurangan 50% hingga 60% beliau perlu meneruskan operasi kerana ia penting untuk rantaian bekalan.

“Saya tidak boleh berhenti kerana perniagaan saya adalah seperti nadi. Jika saya berhenti, ia akan menjejaskan 2 juta pengguna di Kuala Lumpur, ” katanya.

Bekalan ikannya antara lain datang daripada nelayan di Kuala Selangor, Sabah dan Sarawak, selain Thailand dan Bangladesh. Ia kemudian dikumpulkan di pasar borong Selayang untuk dijual kepada peniaga dan pengusaha restoran sebelum mereka memulakan perniagaan.

Pasar borong itu masih dibenarkan beroperasi dari tengah malam hingga 7 pagi sepanjang tempoh PKP.

Ibrahim berkata walaupun tidak ada sekatan ke atas bilangan orang yang membeli dan menjual, pemeriksaan kesihatan dilakukan di setiap pintu masuk.

Eksesais nyah kuman juga dijalankan secara berkala di pasar borong.

Ibrahim berkata, pelanjutan tempoh PKP ketika bulan Ramadan mungkin akan menjadi malapetaka bagi nelayan dan pembekal ikan.

Bagaimanapun, jika sekatan itu dilonggarkan dalam tempoh itu, perniagaan boleh kembali pulih secepat mungkin, tambahnya.

Presiden Persatuan Pemborong Buah-buahan Kuala Lumpur, Chin Nyuk Moi berkata, sekatan terhadap pasar pagi dan pasar malam memberi kesan terhadap peniaga.

“Kami sememangnya merasai kesan ini,” katanya.

Beliau menambah ramai peniaga tidak lagi datang ke pasar borong.

“Walaupun petani menghantar hasil mereka kepada kami, ia akan membebankan kami. Buah-buahan akan rosak dalam tempoh 3 hari. Akan berlaku banyak pembaziran. ”

Chin yang juga pengimport buah-buahan berkata, beliau kini akan menempah buah-buahan import sekiranya pelanggan mahukannya.

Bagaimanapun beliau berkata, situasi itu tidak membabitkan pemborong buah-buahan tempatan.

Peniaga buah buahan tempatan, Lai Kong Fong, yang biasanya menjual pisang, jambu, nanas dan belimbing berkata, kebanyakan pemborong “menghentikan hampir semua kegiatan”.

Katanya, beliau meminta pemborong menghentikan penghantaran hasil mereka selama 2 minggu ketika ini.

Beliau juga berkata, kumpulan seperti pengusaha nanas dari negeri seperti Johor menghadapi kesukaran memasarkan hasil mereka.

“Tidak ramai yang keluar. Kami adalah perkhidmatan penting, tetapi ini bukan perkara paling penting. Kita juga mahu melindungi diri kita daripada virus ini,” tambahnya.

Kerajaan mengumumkan semua aktiviti berkaitan pertanian dan penangkapan ikan, termasuk kilang, dibenarkan beroperasi ketika tempoh PKP.

Menteri Kanan Keselamatan Ismail Sabri Yaakob berkata, kedai yang menjual baja dan peralatan yang diperlukan untuk pertanian dan menangkap ikap juga dibenarkan beroperasi.