Najib under fire in Malaysia and Europe over Altantuya commission and murder case


Khamis, 5 Mac 2009 • Kategori: Berita Semasa, Berita Utama, English News, Kedah, Kelantan, Nasional, Parlimen, Perak, Politik, Pulau Pinang, Selangor & Putrajaya



It would be taboo to shame the incoming prime minister, even though he may shame the nation

Ianya akan menjadi sesuatu yang amat memalukan kepada kemunculan perdana menteri yang baru,jika tidak pun ianya akan memalukan negara sendiri

Terjemahan dari Wong Choon Mei




Ada satu berita yang sedang hangat diperkatan dalam sebuah tabloid terkenal dan amat di minati di Perancis iaitu "liberation" yang mendapati bahawa ianya melibatkan Timbalan perdfana Menteri Najib Tun Razak, selepas mereka menyiasat bagaiman seorang wanita cantik dari Mongolia yang menjadi penterjemah, Altantunya Shariibuu , yang telah dibunuh di Malaysia 2 tahun yang lalu.

Already, lawmakers in Parliament are questioning whether Malaysia should be led by the scandal-plagued Najib, who has been dogged by allegations of graft throughout his 33-year career and lately - of being involved in the ruthless and gruesome murder of Altantuya, whom many believe was his one-time mistress.


In power since independence from British rule in 1957, Malaysia’s Umno-led government makes no bones about abusing and bullying federal institutions into carrying out the political will of its leaders. Unsurprisingly then that its credibility and those of its leaders, such as Najib, have plummeted to ground zero.




Although, the 55-year old has repeatedly denied the allegations, the speculation and the stories have refused to go away. To a large extent, Najib has himself and the Umno system to which he was born to blame.


In power since independence from British rule in 1957, Malaysia’s Umno-led government makes no bones about abusing and bullying federal institutions into carrying out the political will of its leaders. Unsurprisingly then that its credibility and those of its leaders, such as Najib, have plummeted to ground zero.


In Parliament today, Machang MP Saifuddin Nasution read out an excerpt of the Liberation report, which recounted how the pregnant Altantuya had begged for her life before she was shot in the left side of her face.


Noone - whether in august House or elsewhere in the nation - was surprised when Deputy Speaker Ronald Kiandee refused to let him continue with what could turn out to be a sizzling string of embarrassing questions. It would be taboo to shame the incoming prime minister, even though he may shame the nation!


Yet, apart from saving face, aside from politics, is there anyone who remembers that whatever her role, Altantuya was a human being whose life was wrenched from her against her will.
So perhaps, this is also why public interest has stuck stubbornly on the case. Despite the hot headlines, there are just too many unanswered questions over who conspired in her killing, including why she should be denied the justice of having those guilty brought to the dock and punished.


Making the headlines in Europe


In the Liberation article, journalist Arnaud Dubus revealed details from a cautioned statement obtained from Malaysian police sources. According to the statement, Dubus said how her killers denied her pleas for mercy and shot her first in the face, and then again, when they noticed her hand was still moving.


Malaysia’s own controversial blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin has since posted on his blog a cautioned statement from Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, who together with his colleague Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri, are standing trial for Altantuya’s killing.



According to the Liberation, the slim and doe-eyed Mongolian beauty was also stripped of her clothes, before explosives were wrapped around her legs, her abdomen and her head and then set off.
Dubus also reported that Najib met Altantuya together with his close aide Razak Baginda in Paris in 2005. A photograph was also taken showing the three in a Paris nightclub, the Liberation article said.
Interestingly, a private investigator in Malaysia also involved in the case had previously disclosed the 28-year old Altantuya was Najib’s mistress before he passed her onto Razak Baginda.


The Liberation also suggested that Razak was Najib’s intermediary for arms purchases. When Altantuya found out in October 2006 that Armaris, the sprawling Europeans arms maker, had paid out the commission for Malaysia’s one billion euros (RM4.7 billion) purchase of three submarines, she flew over immediately.


The commission was allegedly paid into the account of a Razak-controlled company Perimekar and amounted to 114 million euros. Altantuya’s share was US$500,000.
But according to the Liberation, a jealous Rosmah Mansor - Najib’s wife - refused to give her a cent. And this is why she kept pestering Razak Baginda, until her own life was taken.
Meanwhile, Azilah and Sirul, assigned to act as bodyguards for top politicians and their families including Rosmah, will know their fate on April 9, when the court delivers its verdict.



Razak Baginda has of course been acquitted and discharged without his defence being called.
In Parliament today, Machang MP Saifuddin Nasution read out an excerpt of the Liberation report, which recounted how the pregnant Altantuya had begged for her life before she was shot in the left side of her face.


Noone - whether in august House or elsewhere in the nation - was surprised when Deputy Speaker Ronald Kiandee refused to let him continue with what could turn out to be a sizzling string of embarrassing questions. It would be taboo to shame the incoming prime minister, even though he may shame the nation!


Yet, apart from saving face, aside from politics, is there anyone who remembers that whatever her role, Altantuya was a human being whose life was wrenched from her against her will.
So perhaps, this is also why public interest has stuck stubbornly on the case. Despite the hot headlines, there are just too many unanswered questions over who conspired in her killing, including why she should be denied the justice of having those guilty brought to the dock and punished.

Anwar Malaysia sodomy trial moved to High Court



Reuters
Published: March 5, 2009
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial has been transferred to the High Court in a move that his lawyers have said in the past could prejudice the 62-year-old's chances of a fair hearing.

Anwar was only released from prison in 2004 after being sentenced in the late 1990s on what he said were trumped up sodomy and corruption charges and returned to parliament last August when he won a by-election in a seat held by his wife.

Thursday's ruling by a judge at a Kuala Lumpur High court will be appealed against by Anwar, one of his lawyers said.
"We are disappointed and my client is disappointed," Sankara Nair, one of Anwar's lawyers told journalists after the hearing.

The case will be formally heard by the junior Sessions Court next Tuesday and the judge in that court, who had opposed the move to the higher court, will now have to formally transfer the case.

If imprisoned for sodomy Anwar could face 20 years in prison as all homosexual acts in Malaysia, a mainly Muslim country of 27 million people, are against the law.
That would effectively end his political career which has seen him come close to mounting a challenge to the National Front government that has ruled Malaysia for the 51 years since independence from Britain.

The People's Alliance grouping that Anwar now heads deprived the government of its two-thirds parliamentary elections in March 2008 and ended up controlling five of Malaysia's 13 state legislatures, the best ever result for the opposition here.

Their strong performance forced Prime Minister Abudllah Ahmad Badawi to step aside early and he will leave office at the end of March to be replaced by Najib Razak who is currently deputy prime minister and finance minister.

Najib, the son of Malaysia's third prime minister, faces a huge challenge to avert a recession in Malaysia whose exports have been badly hit by the global slowdown.

He will present a mini-budget of new spending measures on March 10.

(Reporting by Razak Ahmad; Writing by David Chance; Editing by David Fox

2 PERKARA PELIK DI PERAK

2 perkara pelik di Perak belum terjawab
Oleh:Kerisijau

1) Dewan Rakyat (DR) dan Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) tempat undang-undang digubal. Sepatutnya ia institusi tertinggi negara dan negeri mengatasi Mahkamah.

Tetapi di Perak, Mahkamah lebih tinggi dari DUN, sedangkan DUN menggubal undang2 utk dilaksanakan oleh mahkamah.

2) Speaker adalah jawatan paling tinggi dlm DUN. Setiausaha DUN perlu patuhi arahan Speaker.

Tetapi di Perak, Setiausaha DUN lebih tinggi dari Speaker. Setiausaha boleh kunci Dewan Undangan Negeri. Speaker terpaksa bersidang bawah pokok!.