DEBAT- SABERY BUKAN SETARAF ANWAR

SAH...Anwar beri surat setuju debat dengan ShaberyJuly 8, 2008 : 03.52 PM(AGENDA DAILY)

Penasihat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim telah memberikan persetujuan hitam putih bertarikh 7 Julai kepada Agendadaily untuk hadir bagi berdebat dengan Menteri Penerangan Datuk Ahmad Shabery Cheek. Surat berkenaan diserahkan oleh Pengrah Strategi PKR, Saifuddin Nasution Ismail yang dilantik oleh Anwar bagi pihaknya untuk menguruskan prosedur debat berkenaan. Shabery telah memberi surat sahkan kehadirannya pada 26 Jun lalu. Debat tersebut akan berlangsung pada 15 Julai depan (Selasa) jam 9 malam di Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Debat itu akan disiarkan secara langsung dan pihak Agendadaily telah mendapat pengesahan stesen TV yang akan siarkan debat itu secara langsung. - 8/7/2008

KOMEN BLOGGER

Namun semua rakyat Malaysia merasakan bahawa tandingan Ahmad Saberi bukannya Anwar-Anwar sebetulnya mahukan debat ini berlangsung antara PM Abdullah Badawi dan juga Najib Tun Razak atau paling lekeh Ketua pemuda UMNO atau paling lekeh lagi Timbalan ketua pemuda UMNo Khairy Jamaluddin .Hishammudin Huseein sendiri yang dilihat begitu angkuh menghentam Anwar.Namun semua tahu akan sikap Hishamuddin Hussein dalam menghadapi sesuatu debat.

Ahmad Sabery atau lain-lain menteri kabinet hanya layak untuk bertanding dengan Saifuddin,Azmin,Dr hatta,Hishamudin Rais dan beberapa tokoh lain yang berada dalam Pakatan Rakyat.itu pun belum tentu fakta-fakta dan pandangan-pandangan yang diberikan dapat meyakinkan audien.Adakah UMNO melihat ini sebagai satu yang akan memalukan mereka kerana selama ini ramai panglima mereka yang menghentam Anwar.Bagaimana pula dengan Ali Rostam,Rafidah Aziz,Azalina Othman,Noraini Ahmad dan lain-lain lagi.inilah sebenarnya pentas untuk mereka dan pihak kerajaan khasnya UMNO yang selama ini menyerang beliau habis habisan menafikan pandangan Anwar.Apakah UMNo yakin dengan Sabery???

Anwar sendiri menjelaskan bahawa beliau lebih berhasrat untuk bertemu dengan Abdullah atau Najib sebagai "kepala" kepada parti masing-masing Abdullah mewakili BN manakala Anwar mewakili PR.. Melihat akan pengalaman Anwar memang Sabery bukan tandingannya.

MAT SABU- TUBUHKAN SURUHANJAYA SIASATAN DIRAJA HADAPI KRISIS KEPIMPINAN NEGARA

Guar Perahu- 7 Julai- Hampir lebih 8000 hadir dalam siri ceramah penerangan oleh Mat Sabu malam semalam .Beliau yang dalam rangka lawatan dan untuk menghadiri perbicaraan hari ini (8 Julai) di mahkamah majestret Jawi telah memberi penerangan mengenai beberapa perkara yang sedang berlaku dalam negara masa kini.

Perkara utama yang diterangkan dikhalayak umum ialah berhubung dengan situasi dalam negara buat masa kini. Antaranya ialah berhubung dengan kes yang membabitkan beberapa profil tinggi negara.Kes laporan RPK,kes SD P. Balasubramaniam,dakwaan liwat Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim dan juga kes yang membabitkan Ketua polis negara dan peguam negara Gain Patail.

Dalam hal ini ,menurut Mat Sabu, negara berada dalam keadaan tegang,macamerba dan rakyat menjadi malu dengan gelagat pimpinan negara yang seharusnya menjadi lebih telus dan berwibawa.”negara kita seperti negara jakun”, demikian jelas beliau secara berseloroh.”.Mana mungkin negara yang mengaku nagara maju kini terlibat dalam berbagai kes yang mana kita anggap kerajaan cuba untuk menutup beberapa kelemahan yang dihadapi dan cuba menumpukan kepada kes Anwar, dan dengan yang demikian kita memohon pihak istana agar melakukan dan menyiasat serta menubuhkan suruhanjaya siasatan Diraja sebagaimana yang berlaku dalam kes “mata lebam” yang melibatkan Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim dulu dan sehingga tertubuhnya suruhanjaya barulah kita mengetahui bahawa yang menumbuk beliau adalah ketua polis negara, begitu juga lah dengan kes ini. Adalah lebih baik kita tubuhkan Suruhanjaya Siasatan di Raja bagi menyelesaikan masalaah ini.”, demikian jelas Mat Sabu lagi.

Beliau juga menjelaskan betapa rakyat Malaysia berasa malu dengan kredibiliti pimpinan negara dan dengan ini mana mungkin para pelabur akan datang dan seterusnya amat memalukan kepimpinan Abdullah Badawi.

LEBIH 30 RIBU SAMBUT ANWAR

LEBIH 30 RIBU SAMBUT ANWAR SEBAGAI WIRA RAKYAT


Seberang Jaya 5 Julai- Sambutan terhadap wira rakyat Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim ketika pulang berceramah di Parlimen Permatang Pauh semalam membuktikan bahawa beliau ketika ini diterima rakyat sebagai wira mereka.Beliau yang berceramah di tapak expo Seberang Jaya dibawah Parlimen Permatang Pauh telah menerima puluhan ribu kebanjiran rakyat. Turut bersama ialah timbalan ketua menteri Tuan YB Lim Guan Eng,Dato Zaharin ,ahli parlimen Bayan Baru merangkap Pengerusi Perhubungan Negeri PKR dan juga ahli-ahli YB dari PakatanRakyat.

Dalam ucapan beliau , Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim tetap menegaskan bahawa komitmen kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat ialah membentuk sebuah Negara yang perihatin kepada rakyat dan mengulangi lagi bahawa jika rakyat percaya dengan kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat, dan jika hari ini Pakatan Rakyat menjadi kerajaan esok juga harga minyak akan diturunkan.

“Jika kamu(BN tidak layak untuk menolong rakyat biar kami (PR) yang memerintah.”demikian jelas Anwar .Beliau juga mempersoalkan kemana hilangnya wang berbillion ringgit dengan kenaikkan harga minyak.Jika rakyat mahukan perubahan ,rakyat harus mendesak ahli Parlimen mereka untuk bertukar kepada Pakatan Rakyat.

Berhubung dengan kes yang menuduh beliau melakukan liwat ,Anwar juga mnegaskan bahawa ada pakatan yang cuba mengaibkan beliau dan ini sudah tentunya telah dirancang.”Saya telah membuat laporan berhubung penglibatan Musa Hassan dan juga Gani patail berhubung dengan kesilapan membuat laporan kes saya pada tahun 1998 dulu”

Beliau juga menegaskan bahawa begitu mudah rakyat yang bernama Saiful ini mendapat layanan istimewa dari seorang Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan datang kerumah siap dengan hidangan makanan dan ini sudah tentulah menimbulkan kesangsian.

Jika ada bukti dan hakim yang berwibawa,bawa saya ke mahkamah”Saya akan lawan habis-habisan”."Memang ada sokongan dari pihak luar misalnya dari Sheikh Yusoff Al Qardawi yang terus menyokong saya."demikian jelas Anwar lagi.

“Saya juga ada bukti bagaimana UMNO memberi wang kepada pelobi Yahudi yang bernama Jack Alamos,bagaimana pula dengan perjumpaaan Abdullah Badawi dan juga Jack Cheney.?

Anwar juga menjelaskan bahawa beliau ke kedutaan Turki adalah untuk menjamin keselamatan beliau dan juga sebagai menunggu jaminan dari pihak kerajaan bahawa beliau tidak akan dianiaya,dan keluar setelah mendapat jaminan dari kerajaan.
“Saya cuma mahukan jaminan.Siasat saya jika ada bukti saya menulis surat untuk meminta perlindungan kepada Amerika Syarikat,jika ada dakwa saya”demikian jelas Anwar.

“Saya bukan takut jika siasatan untuk saya dijalankan secara telus, macamana saya nak percaya jika sepuluh tahun dulu saya ditangkap ,dipukul sehingga hampir mati dan Ketua Polis Negara(Rahim Noor) dan menyatakan bahwa saya dalam keadaaan selamat.Apakah saya tidak bimbang jika perkara ini akan berlaku lagi?Malah saya telah mengikut undang-undang ketika itu namun saya tetap dipukul dan dianiaya,tidak ada rawatan sehingga ditubuhkan Suruahanjaya Siasatan diRaja, malah saya telah maaafkan semua yang telah menganiaya saya, namun mereka masih juga mahu mengaibkan saya ”demikian jelas Anwar.

Kepada rakyat, beliau menyeru agar rakyat berubah fikiran,pilih pimpinan yang dapat menolong rakyat dan rakyat harus bermuafakat untuk selamatkan Malaysia.Isu ini diketengahkan untuk mengalihkan perhatian rakyat ,isu harga minyak ,isu barang ,elektrik dan ini membebankan rakyat ,.Rakyat harus bijak menggunakan kuasa mereka.Saya percaya dalam jangkamasa 2 bulan lagi ekonomi kita akan punah ranah .Oleh itu tanggungjawab rakyat ialah mendesak agar pimpinan mereka bersama Pakatan Rakyat.

Sambutan luar biasa dengan kawalan ketat bridget UKP keadilan mebuktikan bahawa sambutan dan kawalan kepada beliau kini dipertingkatkan.

BALA 'HILANG"????????

Balasubramaniam, keluarga dilaporkan 'hilang' !
Azamin Amin Sat Jul 05, 08 7:54:50 pm MYT
KUALA LUMPUR, 5 Julai (Hrkh) - Penyiasat Persendirian Balasubramaniam yang mencetuskan kontroversi telah dilaporkan 'hilang' selepas mencetuskan kontroversi berhubung dua surat akuan bersumpah berkaitan pembabitan Timbalan Perdana Menteri Dato' Seri Najib Tun Razak dengan kes Altantuya Sharibuu -->
Ini termasuk kehilangan isteri Bala beserta tiga orang anaknya juga turut tidak dapat dikesan sehingga kini.
Kehilangan mereka itu telah dilaporkan oleh anak saudara mereka R Kumaresan, 27 di Balai Polis Brickfields kira-kira jam 5 petang tadi dengan ditemani oleh seorang peguam.
Dalam pada itu, Presiden Majlis Peguam Dato' Ambiga Sreenevasan Akuan bersumpah pertama Bala tidak boleh ditarik balik kerana dibuat mengikut prosedur betul dan disahkan oleh Pesuruhjaya Sumpah.
"Akuan bersumpah adalah dokumen yang mengandungi keterangan yang diberi di bawah ikrar. Pengakuan bertulis di hadapan Pesuruhjaya Sumpah. Dalam kes ini semua keterangan diberi secara bersumpah tidak boleh ditarik balik," katanya.
Pada 3 Julai lalu Bala yang pernah memberi keterangan sebagai saksi pertama pendakwaan dalam perbicaraan kes pembunuhan Altantuya, mengedarkan akuan bersumpah bertarikh 1 Julai setebal 16 muka surat dengan mendakwa wanita Mongolia yang dibunuh itu mempunyai hubungan dengan Najib.
Bagaimanapun kurang daripada 24 jam iaitu keesokan harinya (4 Julai) Bala menarik balik beberapa perenggan dalam akuan bersumpahnya dengan mengatakan kandungan akuan itu mengenai Najib adalah tidak benar.-az _

WAJAH SEBELUM DAN SELEPAS

Akuan Bala tidak boleh ditarik balik

Julai 5, 2008 in Pilihanraya, Politik, Semasa

KUALA LUMPUR 4 Julai - Akuan bersumpah penyiasat persendirian P. Balasubramaniam yang mengaitkan Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak dengan wanita Mongolia, Altantuya Shaariibuu, tidak boleh ditarik balik, kata Presiden Majlis Peguam Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan.
Katanya, akuan bersumpah itu dibuat mengikut prosedur betul dan disahkan oleh Pesuruhjaya Sumpah.
“Akuan bersumpah adalah dokumen yang mengandungi keterangan yang diberi di bawah ikrar. Pengakuan bertulis di hadapan Pesuruhjaya Sumpah. Dalam kes ini semua keterangan diberi secara bersumpah tidak boleh ditarik balik,” katanya.
Bagaimanapun, katanya, sesuatu akuan bersumpah boleh diselitkan tambahan atau pembetulan dan seperti dalam kes di mana seorang saksi memberi keterangan palsu di mahkamah dan sesiapa yang membuat akuan bersumpah palsu boleh melakukan satu kesalahan,” katanya ketika dihubungi Bernama di sini hari ini.
- Bernama

KENYATAAN TUAN AMERICK SINGH SIDHU

Respon Rasmi Peguambela Balasubramaniam Berhubung Penarikan Akuan Bersumpah
4 July 2008, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Saya difahamkan bahawa En Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal telah mengeluarkan kenyataan dalam satu sidang media di Hotel Prince, 11 pagi tadi, menarik balik kenyataannya yang dibuat pada 1 julai 2008.
Alasan yang diberikan untuk menarik balik akuan bersumpah asal yang dibuat, yang dirakamkan oleh diri saya sendiri, ialah “dipaksa membuat pengesahan melalui ugutan”.
Tiada sebarang butiran berhubung paksaan dan ugutan telah diketengahkan. En Bala dilaporkan tidak menjawab soalan yang dikemukakan pagi tadi di dalam sidang medianya siapa yang mengugutnya.
Untuk rekod, Saya mengesahkan bahawa perakuan bersumpah yang dilakukanoleh En Bala pada 1 Julai 2008 yang disiarkannya semalam dibuat secara sukarela dihadapan kehadiran saya dan pesuruhjaya sumpah, Dr T. Yokheswarem.
Saya menemui En Bala untk pertama kalinya, dengan kehadiran beberapa individu lain kira-kira dua bulan lalu dimana beliau telah meminta bantuan saya untuk menyediakan satu dokumen rasmi merangkumi beberapa bukti yang telah tidak diketengehakan dalam perbicaraan Altantuya yang sedang berlangsung.
Saya meulakan proses berkenaan dua minggu selepas itu. Saya telah menemuinya beberap kali dimana apa yang dinyatakan oleh En Bala pada saya telah saya rakamkan secara bertulis.
Saya tidak mempunyai alasan untuk meragui apa yang En bala nyatakan pada saya selain daripada ia adalah yang benar dan peranan saya adalah untuk mendengar apa yang beliau katakan dan menulisnya menjadi satu perakuan bersumpah dalam format yang sistematik dan komprehensif.
Kenyataan bersumpah itu kemudian dilakukan pengesahan dihadapan pesuruhjaya sumpah yang dinyataan di atas yang bertanyakan pada En Bala samada beliau faham isi kandungannya dan samada ia adalah pengakuan bersumpah beliau sendiri..
Selepas En Bala mengesahkannya, beliau telah diminta untuk menandatangani tiga salinan dan pesurujaya kemudiannya mengesahkannya. En bala telah diminta menunjukkan kad pengenalannya kepada pesuruhjaya sumpah dan kemudiannya menadtangani buku rekod.
Sehubungan itu, saya amat terkejut dengan tindakan En Bala yang dalam masa 24 jam telah mendapatkan perkhidmata peguam lain dan membuat satu lagi perakuan bersumpah menyatakan perakuan bersumpah yang pertama adalah tidak benar dan beliau dipaksa membuatnya.
Oleh kerana saya amat mengenali sifat En Bala, selepas menghabiskan masa berjam-jam merakamkan kenyataannya, saya meragui beliau menandatangani perakuan bersumaph yang kedua dengan rela dan saya yakin beliau diugut berbuat demikian samada melalui ancaman ataupun janji kerana saya tidak dapat memikirkan alasan lain.
Pesuruhjaya sumpah yang mengesahkan perakuan bersumpah yang pertama bersedia untuk megesahkan apa yang telah saya katakan di atas berkaitan perakuan bersumpah telah dibuat oleh En Bala dengan secara sukarela.
Lagipun, En Bala mengenali pesuruhjaya sumpah berkenaan sebaik saja En Bala nampak beliau kerana mereka berasal daripada perkampungan yang sama di Slim River, yang sesuatu tidak saya ketahui.
Americk Singh Sidhu

SEKEJAB DI BALAI JALAN TRAVELS , SEKEJAP DI PONDOK POLIS HKL....HAI MANA SATU LAAAA..MARI KITA KAJI

Sehubungan itu, Ismail Sabri berharap orang ramai tidak akan terpengaruh dengan Anwar dan menjauhkan diri daripada menyertai sebarang perhimpunan yang dian jurkan pemimpin pembangkang itu.
“Rakyat fikirlah sendiri apa yang terbaik, tetapi jangan terpengaruh dengan agenda peribadi mana-mana pihak,” katanya.
Jelasnya, jika tindakan mementingkan diri Anwar itu dilayan, dibimbangi akan membawa keadaan tidak stabil yang seterusnya menjauhkan pelabur dan memusnahkan ekonomi negara.
Khamis lepas, pembantu Anwar, Mohd. Saiful Bukhari Azlan, 23, membuat laporan di Pondok Polis Hospital Kuala Lumpur, mendakwa dia diliwat oleh majikannya di sebuah kondominium di Bukit Damansara.
Anwar selepas itu dilihat mengambil beberapa tindakan yang sukar untuk difahami termasuk menyembunyikan diri di Kedutaan Turki atas alasan keselamatannya teran cam. - Utusan


KENAPA IANYA AGAK PELIK DAN TANDATANYA RAKYAT????
Antaranya;
* Kenapa mudah sangat Saiful dapat masuk ke rumah TPM? * Dalam kesibukan Najib - sempat untuk menerima aduan seorang “pekerja” Anwar? * Siapa yang membawa Saiful jumpa Najib? * Siapa lagi bersama TPM bila Saiful mengadu kes liwat? * Apakah Rosmah ada sama - sepertimana dicabar oleh Shamsul AMK? * Kenapa Saiful tidak lapor kepada pemimpin yang tertinggi - Pak Lah? Kenapa Najib? * Kenapa tidak hubungi terus pegawai polis? Najib kata dia percaya kepada sistem! * Kenapa Najib tidak suruh lapor sahaja kepada polis? Najib kata dia percaya kepada sistem!
Tetapi suatu “fakta” yang menimbul persoalan besar kepada IB ialah seperti berikut:
Mengikut laporan polis, Saiful dikatakan diliwat pada 26 Jun. Saiful lapor pada 28 Jun, 5.45 ptg. Najib kata Saiful jumpa dia beberapa hari sebelum buat laporan polis. Tidak mungkin 29hb. Kalau 29hb, disebut semalam. Bilakah harinya bila Najib sebut “beberapa hari” itu?
Suatu yang aneh dalam laporan polis tersebut ialah, Saiful tidak menyatakan waktu dia diliwat. Amat pelik bagi polis yang menerima laporan tidak bertanya dan meminta Saiful untuk meletakkan waktunya. Kalau kita buat laporan kemalangan, polis di kaunter akan suruh kita nyatakan waktu berlaku kemalangan!
Sebab itulah apabila kita berbohong, maka kita terpaksa berbohong lagi untuk menutupi pembohongan lampau. Dan apabila suatu pembohongan terbongkar, maka terlodeh terus yang lain, satu demi satu.

HAI BALA.....ADA APA DENGAN AKUAN SUMPAH...JANGAN-JANGAN JADI SESUMPAH

Bala buat Akuan Bersumpah Pertama secara sukarela - Peguam

Azamin Amin Sat Jul 05, 08 9:31:17 am MYT

KUALA LUMPUR, 5 Julai (Hrkh) - Surat Akuan Bersumpah yang pertama dibuat oleh penyiasat persendirian Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal telah dibuat secara sukarela dihadapan pesuruhjaya sumpah pada 1 Julai lalu. -->
Demikian petikan kenyataan peguam Americk Singh Sidhu berhubung isu penarikan balik surat akuan bersumpah pertama yang telah disiarkan media pada 3 Julai lalu.
"Untuk rekod, saya mengesahkan bahawa perakuan bersumpah yang dilakukan oleh En Bala pada 1 Julai 2008 yang disiarkannya semalam dibuat secara sukarela dihadapan kehadiran saya dan pesuruhjaya sumpah, Dr T. Yokheswarem," kata Americk semalam.
Katanya beliau telah menemui Bala untuk pertama kalinya, dengan kehadiran beberapa individu lain kira-kira dua bulan lalu dimana beliau telah meminta bantuan untuk menyediakan satu dokumen rasmi merangkumi beberapa bukti yang telah tidak diketengehakan dalam perbicaraan Altantuya yang sedang berlangsung.
Kata Americk beliau memulakan proses dokumentasi itu dua minggu selepas itu dan telah menemuinya beberapa kali dan apa yang dinyatakan oleh Bala dirakamkan secara bertulis.
"Saya tidak mempunyai alasan untuk meragui apa yang Bala nyatakan pada saya selain daripada ia adalah yang benar.
"Dan peranan saya adalah untuk mendengar apa yang beliau katakan dan menulisnya menjadi satu perakuan bersumpah dalam format yang sistematik dan komprehensif," katanya lagi.
Sehubungan itu, Americk amat terkejut dengan tindakan Bala yang dalam masa 24 jam telah mendapatkan perkhidmatan peguam lain dan membuat satu lagi perakuan bersumpah menyatakan perakuan bersumpah yang pertama adalah tidak benar dan beliau dipaksa membuatnya.
"...Saya meragui beliau menandatangani perakuan bersumpah yang kedua dengan rela dan saya yakin beliau diugut berbuat demikian sama ada melalui ancaman ataupun janji kerana saya tidak dapat memikirkan alasan lain," katanya.
Beliau juga menyatakan kesediaan Pesuruhjaya Sumpah untuk mengesahkan perakuan bersumpah yang pertama dibuat oleh Bala dibuat secara sukarela. _

FROM MALAYSIAKINI

Did Bala commit an offence?
Jul 5, 08 11:50am
So private investigator P Balasubramaniam made two statutory declarations (SD) within two days, declaring on two separate occasions that he signed them voluntarily.
MCPXThe problem is that they were two contradictory SDs - so one has to be true and the other false. Which one is a lie is for the court to decide in due course.Meantime, did the private eye commit a crime by his action.Many lawyers think so. DAP chairperson and lawyer Karpal Singh says that lying under oath in a SD is wrong and he wants Balasubramaniam to be investigated under the Penal Code.“One cannot just make such a declaration and later withdraw it and such an act amounted to giving false evidence, an offence which carries a maximum of seven years' jail”, the New Straits Times quoted him as saying today.Karpal said it was baffling that the private investigator was now claiming he made the declaration under duress."What duress is he talking about. He has not given any details of the kind of duress under which he made it (the statutory declaration). The sting of his declaration is now gone," he said."I am acting on behalf on Altantuya Shaariibuu and the Mongolian government in her murder trial. The dramatic disclosure in the declaration is a serious matter which involves Malaysia's reputation," Karpal added.
Recall Bala to the stand
Kuala Lumpur Bar criminal practice committee chairperson N Sivananthan also said Balasubramaniam has committed an offence for making conflicting SD in relation to the ongoing Altantuya murder trial.He said the prosecution or the defence should recall the private investigator to the stand as the contents of the first SD were related to the case, adding that recalling Balasubramaniam to the witness stand was provided for under the law.Lawyer Gurbachan Singh said a SD stood as truth as it was made under oath."Balasubramaniam's claim that he made the first SD under duress was a mere excuse. This is utter nonsense because he had a lawyer advising him. Moreover, the SD was made before a Commissioner for Oaths," he told the national daily.He said no lawyer was going to draft a SD without his client's instruction.Lawyer Mohamad Ramli Abdul Manan said Balasubramaniam made two contradictory statutory declarations. "Both cannot be true or false. One of it is definitely false."He said whether Balasubramaniam was going to be prosecuted was another question.."But Balasubramaniam will have to explain why he made two conflicting SDs," Mohamad Ramli told the NST.Meanwhile, Bar Council chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan said the first SD made by private Balasubramaniam linking Najib Razak with Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu, cannot be withdrawn."A statutory declaration is a document that contains evidence given on oath. It is sworn before a commissioner for oaths. As in the case of all evidence given under oath, it cannot be withdrawn," she told Bernama last night.
Perjury charges
A serving judge meanwhile opined that Balasubramaniam’s act of retracting his initial declaration, which made serious accusations against Najib, could open the former to perjury charges.
According to the judge, who declined to be named, affirming a statutory declaration was akin to giving evidence in court.“Under the normal rule of evidence, one cannot withdraw it unless he has very strong reasons. Those reasons must be included in the withdrawal or else he would be committing perjury,” he told the Star.He said if one was citing duress as a reason for making false accusations in a statutory declaration, he must present proof of such pressure.“He must show that the pressure was serious like it’s life-threatening to him or his family members. He cannot just say that he is withdrawing the statutory statement because he had earlier been forced to do it. Someone can now lodge a police report against him and he could face a perjury charge,” the judge added.
Conduct immediate probe
Meanwhile, social reform movement Aliran wants the police to investigate immediately on what transpired the night Balasubramaniam went to the Brickfields police station in Kuala Lumpur to meet a police officer.
"We believe 'what happened on that night' could unknot the mystery behind the private investigator's contradicting sworn statements," its president P Ramakrishnan said in a statement.He called on the investigation to be transparent and leave no stone unturned for the truth to prevail as Malaysians were skeptical about the private eye's second statutory declaration."Malaysians are curious on the happenings behind the scene that transformed the former Special Branch lance corporal to change his mind on his first sworn statement in less than 24 hours."We all want to know what transpired in-between the night the private eye apparently went to meet an officer at the police station and the morning he came up with his retraction," Ramakrishnan added.
Deputy Inspector-General of Police Ismail Omar said yesterday that the police will investigate the two SDs made by Balasubramaniam, said According to Bernama, he announced that the police would continue to carry out their investigations as there might be hidden motives involved."There might be intentions to create diversion, so we should carry out a thorough investigation," said Ismail.Man of the hour, Balasubramaniam made a second statutory declaration on Friday retracting his first one made Thursday.The first one revealed explosive evidence linking Najib with the murdered Mongolian woman.But his second SD retracts every thing that he had solemnly sworn in the first under the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.Since the first statutory declaration was a lie, Ramakrishnan said the authorities have to move fast to investigate the authenticity of the second one to determine that it was not concocted, and done freely, voluntarily and not under duress.

PROTES DI TUKAR LAGI TEMPAT

Protes Sejuta Rakyat Ditukar Ke Stadium MBPJ Kelana Jaya
Jumaat, 4 Julai 2008 • Kategori: Berita Utama
Perhimpunan Aman Protes Sejuta Rakyat yang dijadualkan pada 6 Julai ini di Padang Timur Petaling Jaya ditukar ke Stadium MBPJ Kelana Jaya.


Penyelaras Gabungan Protes Dr Hatta Ramli mengesahkan penukaran lokasi perhimpunan itu. Menurut Ketua Angkatan Muda KeADILan (AMK) Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin, perubahan tempat itu diputuskan dalam mesyuarat Pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat di kediaman Ketua Umum KeADILan Anwar Ibrahim di Bukit Segambut Damansara malam semalam.


Parti-parti Pakatan Rakyat dijangka menggemblengkan sejuta rakyat sebagai tanda bantahan kepada kenaikan harga minyak dan inflasi mutakhir ini.


Stadium Kelana Jaya, terletak berhampiran Tasik Kelana Jaya dan pasaraya Giant, boleh memuatkan 50,000 tempat duduk dan terletak bersebelahan Lebuhraya Damansara-Puchong. Padangnya juga boleh memuatkuan jumlah hadirin yang sama.


Hadirin boleh menaiki sistem Transit Aliran Ringan (LRT) ke Stesen Kelana Jaya atau Taman Bahagia, atau menggunakan perkhidmatan bas Rapid KL iaitu: U84 Pasar Seni-Kelana Jaya, U86 Bandar Utama-Sri Damansara, U88 Pasar Seni-Kota Damansara dan U89 Stesen LRT Kelana Jaya-Kota Damansara, T623 Stesen LRT Kelana Jaya-Taman Mayang Mas, T624 Kelana Jaya Sunway-Subang Parade dan T625 Kelana Jaya-Stadium MBPJ.

Kenyataan Anwar dan Tiga Setiausaha Agong

ADAKAN PERHIMPUNAN RAKYAT DI STADIUM KELANA JAYA

Pakatan Rakyat berpandangan rakyat perlu diberikan ruang untuk mengeluarkan pendapat dan berkumpul bagi melahirkan rasa tidak puas hati terhadap keputusan kerajaan menaikkan harga minyak dengan begitu drastik tanpa alasan kukuh.

Melihat kepada perkembangan suasana politik semasa Pakatan Rakyat menasihatkan agar Perhimpunan Rakyat yang dijadualkan pada Ahad 6 Julai ini dibuat di Stadium Kelana Jaya. Kami dimaklumkan pihak Protes juga bersetuju dengan cadangan kami ini.

Kami menyeru rakyat yang mendokong perjuangan menegakkan kerajaan yang lebih adil dan telus agar menyertai perhimpunan aman pada hari Ahad ini. Rakyat juga dinasihatkan agar tidak terpengaruh dengan provokasi pihak luar.



Dato’ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim
Ketua Umum PKR


YAB Lim Guan Eng
Setiausaha Agung DAP


YB Dato’ Kamarudin Jaffar
Setiusaha Agung PAS


Datuk Salehudin Hashim
Setiausaha Agung PKR

SHAME ON MALAYSIAN-TAHUN MELIWAT MALAYSIA

Anwar vs Najib: 'Liwat meliwat'

Ong Kian Ming & Oon Yeoh Jul 4, 08 12:46pm
Just when we thought that the political situation i
n Malaysia could not get any more exciting – or sensational – it does. It seems every few days, there's a new twist in the political scene that has enthralled a nation.No one could have anticipated that hot on the heels of an accusation of sodomy directed at de facto PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim that a similar accusation would be directed at Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak.Rumours of a possible link between Najib and Altantuya have been circulating ever since the Mongolian translator was brutally murdered. What makes the statutory declaration by private investigator, P Balasubramaniam, explosive is his revelation that firstly, Abdul Razak Baginda had told him that it was Najib who first introduced him to Altantuya and secondly, that Najib had a sexual relationship with the woman.The situation became even more muddled when just a day later, the PI retracted his statutory declaration and introduced a new one, which excludes all references to Najib.

MEMANG BALA MENCARI BALA.....KEJAB YA KEJAB TIDAK

Hari ini P.Balasubramaniam PI yang telah menyatakan bahawa Dato Najib terlibat bertemu dan diperkenalkan kepada Razak Baginda dan telah terlibat dengan kegiatan tidak bermoral....hari ini beliau telah menarik balik..

25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-25.1 He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.25.3 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the Deputy Prime Minister.25.4 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in Paris.25.5 Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris

28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following :-28.1 That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.28.2 That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in Paris.28.3 That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a Submarine deal in Paris.28.4 That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.28.5 That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment

WHY SHOULD I BE INVESTIGATED?-Susan loone

Kenyataan PM di recycle untuk perhatian TPM: "Dia tentu buat penafian, lazimnya begitulah orang yang dituduh akan buat penafian tetapi kalau ada bukti, maka polis perlu siasat.’’ - Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

But first, did he lie? First he said he hadn’t met the victim of sodomy, then he said he met him at his house:
Najib admitted meeting Saiful Bukhari Azlan a few days before he (Saiful) lodged a police report against Anwar Ibrahim, accusing the PKR leader of sodomising him.
“He came to my house because he needed my help because he was so traumatised. That was it,” Najib told reporters in Parliament.
He added that there was no conspiracy involved in the police report as being claimed by Anwar. “I did not advise Saiful to lodge a police report”.
So why should I be investigated?
That’s what Najib Tun Razak said at a press conference this evening when he was asked about the explosive statutory declaration by P Balasubramaniam linking him to the murdered Altantuya at Anwar Ibrahim’s office yesterday.
Erm…if you were innocent, you’ll say: Come, come one and come all, investigate me!
Instead Najib retorted: Give me one reason why should I be investigated? God, there had been several reasons. But he chose to dismiss them all as “concocted claims” out to tarnish his reputation.
He used the same line as his supporters did “Why happen only now”? (more…)

KENAPA SAYA SEHARUSNYA DISIASAT?

Mulanya adakah dia berbohong?beliau pada mulanya menyatakan bahawa beliau tidak pernah bertemu dengan mangsa kes liwat,tetapi kemudiannya beliau manyatakan bahawa mangsa datang berjumpanya di rumah.........entah la Najib

TESTING...TESTING YB HAMDAN DALAM PELANCARAN KEMPEN PROGRAM DSAI 5 JULAI

YB Hamdan melancarkan program penerangan dan sebaran maklumat bergerak program ceramah perdana Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim.Beliau memberi kebenaran menggunakan kenderaan KADUN Permatang Pasir.

CERAMAH PERDANA DSAI
TEMPAT:TAPAK EXPO SEBERANG JAYA
TARIKH:5 JULAI 2008
HARI :SABTU
MASA 9.00 MALAM

FROM ANILL NETTO-DECLARATION ON NAJIB

Statutory Declaration Indicates Najib Knew Altantuya

Posted on July 3rd, 2008 by Nathaniel Tan

The declaration was made by P Balasubramaniam, Razak Baginda’s private investigator.
Here is the SD in full. Note Paras 25, 28, and 45-52. My sincere apologies to the family of the deceased if any part is deemed offensive.
STATUTORY DECLARATION
I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal a Malaysian Citizen of full age and residing at [deleted] do solemly and sincerely declare as follows :-
1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force having jointed as a constable in 1981 attached to the Police Field Force. I was then promoted to the rank of lance Corporal and finally resigned from the Police Force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.
2. I have been working as a free lance Private Investigator since I left the Police Force.
3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang between the hours of 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m each working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.
4. I resigned from this job after 2 ½ days as I was not receiving any proper instructions.
5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the 05-10-2006 as he had apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaaribuu.
6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of Altantuya Shaaribuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.
7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaaribuu had been given some powers by a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of this.
8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.
9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused to do so as he informed me there were some high profile people involved.
10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaaribuu was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in Mongolia.
11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed and his daughter harassed.
12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as well.
13. On the 09.10.2006 I received a phone call from Abdul Razak Baginda at about 9.30 a.m. informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later. Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some Hotel Malaya note paper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.
14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.
15. These 3 Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day at about 12.00 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.
16. On the 11.10.2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak Baginda showed me the note which basically asked him to call her urgently.
17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he declined as he felt she would have to return to Mongolia as soon as her cash ran out.
18. In the meantime I had arranged for Suras to perform surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these 3 Mongolian girls, but they recognized him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.
19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.
20. On the 14.10.2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights when I was not there. Abdul Razak Baginda called me on my handphone to inform me of this so I rushed back to his house. As I arrived, I noticed Aminah outside the front gates shouting “Razak, bastard, come out from the house”. I tried to calm her down but couldn’t so I called the police who arrived in 2 patrol cars. I explained the situation to the police, who took her away to the Brickfields police station.
21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police report but they refused.
22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own Private Investigator, one Mr. Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for USD$500,000.00 and 3 tickets to Mongolia, apparently as commission owed to Aminah from a deal in Paris.
23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.
24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.
25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-
25.1 He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.
25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.
25.3 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the Deputy Prime Minister.
25.4 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in Paris.
25.5 Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris.
26. On the 19.10.2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights to begin my night duty. I had parked my car outside as usual. I saw a yellow proton perdana taxi pass by with 3 ladies inside, one of whom was Aminah. The taxi did a U-turn and stopped in front of the house where these ladies rolled down the window and wished me ‘Happy Deepavali’. The taxi then left.
27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received an SMS from Razak instructing me “To delay her until my man comes”.
28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following :-
28.1 That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
28.2 That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in Paris.
28.3 That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a Submarine deal in Paris.
28.4 That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.
28.5 That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment.
6. That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in Korea as her mother is Korean whilst her father was a Mongolian/Chinese mix.
28.7 That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda, would I be able to arrange for her to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red proton aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be Lance Corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.
30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue proton saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The drivers window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.
31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red proton and exchanged seats so that Lance Corporal Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.
32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.
33. After the 19.10.2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 a.m. the next morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called ‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.
34. On the night of the 20.10.2006, both of Aminah’s girl friends turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed them she had been arrested the night before.
35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr. Ang and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in the house.
36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi Police Station who was in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls, I believe was Amy.
37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling handphone and I was to pass the phone to the Inspector from Dang Wangi Police Station.
38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi Inspector. The conversation lasted 3 – 4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the next day.
39. On or about the 24.10.2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me to accompany him to the Brickfields police station as he had been advised to lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these Mongolian girls.
40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going to Thailand to lodge a report with the Mongolian consulate there regarding Aminah’s disappearance. Apparently she had sent the same SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda. This is why he told me he had been advised to lodge a police report.
41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the Criminal division, Brickfields police station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.
42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at Brickfields police station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumb drive. I know that this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.
43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my statement instead and so I did.
44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on the 26.10.2006 as this was the day he left for Hong Kong on his own.
45. In mid November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When I arrived there I was immediately arrested under S.506 of the Penal Code for Criminal intimidation.
46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for 5 days. On the third day I was released on police bail.
47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I arrived, I was told I was being arrested under S.302 of the Penal Code for murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for 7 days.
48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on the 19.10.2006 which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.
49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. everyday for 7 consecutive days. I told them all I knew including everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak but when I came to sign my statement, these details had been left out.
50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC for Datuk Seri Najib Razak and/or his wife.
51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.
52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- “ I am seeing IGP at 11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.
53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.
54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-
54.1 State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
54.2 Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
54.3 Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the Court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions case.
54.4 Emphasize the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police Force for 17 years I am absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.
54.5. Express my concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.
55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.
SUBCRIBED and solemnly )
declared by the abovenamed )
Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal ]
this day of 2008 )
Before me,
………………………………….
Commissioner for Oath
Kuala LumpurTags-Malaysian Politics

YB HAMDAN DI UPACARA MENYERAH KUNCI RUMAH KEPADA AHLI UMNO

Permatang Pasir 2 Julai 2008- Rumah seorang ahli UMNO yang pernah saya laporkan mengalami kebakaran pada bulan Mei dahulu , kini telah siap dibina sebagaimana janji yang dibuat oleh YB Hamdan Abdul Rahman, ADUN PAS Permatang Pasir. Turut hadir ialah Timbalan Pengarah Pusat Urus Zakat ( PUZ) negeri Pulau Pinang Sdr Khairy bin Mohd Ghazali,Pengeruasi masjid Pegkalan Kota ,imam masjid, orang kampung,para penyokong, dan orang ramai.

Dalam ucapan beliau YB Hamdan menjelaskan bahawa Pakatan Rakyat sedia membantu rakyat yang mengalami masalah jika perkara ini di laporkan kepada pihak yang berkenaan. Beliau juga menjelaskan bahawa pejabat KADUN Permatang Pasir akan turut membantu orang ramai jika mengalami masalah dan kita akan berusaha sedaya upaya kita untuk membantu dengan bantuan dari pusat-pusat yang selama ini membantu iaitu,PUZ,Pejabat Daerah dan juga dari individu.

"Saya mengucapkan ribuan terima kasih kerana PUZ selama ini banyak membantu masyarakat terutamanya di bawah KADUN Permatang Pasir tanpa rasa jemu dan bertangungjawab dan saya sebagai wakil rakyat mengucapkan rasa kagum dengan usaha PUZ yang terus membantu orang ramai selama ini", demikian jelas YB hamdan lagi.

Majlis penyerahan replika kunci rumah itu dilangsungkan dihadapan rumah yang bernilai RM23000 dengan keluasan20x34 yang mempunyai 3 bilik tidur dan 1 bilik air. Menurut sdr Mohd Khairy lagi PUZ sedia membantu masyarakat islam sekiranya umat islam membayar cukai dan dengan inilah kita dapat membina rumah. Beliau juga mengucapkan terima kasih kepada YB Hamdan kerana memaklumkan kepada pihak kami dan kami sedia membantu masyarakat islam,jika memerlukan bantuan.

"Malahan kami kini turut membantu para pelajar yang mendapat tawaran ke pusat pengajian tinggi,malah dalam tahun ini sahaja kami PUZ telah membina 26 buah rumah dan sejak tahun 2006 lagi kami telah membina hampir 80 buah rumah dengan nilai hampir RM613 ribu ringgit, hasil dari kutipan zakat dari orang ramai", demikian jelas Sdr Mohd Kairy lagi.

Bagi Sdr Mohd Fadzil bin Saad 36 , inilah hadiah yang tidak terhingga dan begitu bangga dan bersyukur kerana YB Hamdan mengambil berat walau pun beliau mengetahui bahawa saya adalah ahli UMNO.Beliau juga merasa kecewa dengan sikap terutamanya pihak UMNO yang langsung tidak bertanya khabar dan akhirnya tampil YB Hamdan yang berusaha mendapatkan bantuan sehingga terbinanya rumah untuk beliau sekeluarga berteduh dengan selesa.

RALAT:3 BILIK TIDUR.TERIMA KASIH KPD YG MAKLUM

link ke laporan terdahulu.

YB HAMDAN SAMPAIKAN SUMBANGAN KEBAKARAN KEPADA AHLI UMNO

DARI KAMPUS NEGARA .NET

Rupa-rupanya, ini Saiful Bukhari! *

Posted on Tuesday, July 01, 2008 @ 20:40:47 MYT by zainulfaqarOLEH: Sdri. Ainis Azreen

BONGKAR!!! -Memang seekor MUSANG! Telahan awal yang dibuat oleh saya dan rakan-rakan lain tidak salah dan sama sekali BENAR. Kehadirannya di tengah-tengah bahang kempen pilihanraya umum ke-12 Mac lalu, memang memusykilkan saya dan teman-teman, yang mengenali siapa dia Saiful Bukhari.
Posting seorang teman blogger dan juga sekampus, Najwan mengenai musang ini memang menepati ramalan. Musang ini akan membawa kemusnahan. Tetapi dalam kes ini, musang ini tidak hanya menggali kubur mangsanya tetapi kuburnya sekali.
Dia mendakwa diliwat oleh seorang pemimpin kanan parti pembangkang. Yang saya pasti, profil pemimpin ini pasti diketahui umum. tetapi bagaimana dengan profil si pendakwa tersebut? Saya pernah berjanji kepada diri untuk tidak mengaitkan diri dengan sebarang perbalahan anak muda yang menjadi lumrah dunia politik. tetapi hari ini, saya akan dedahkan “era kegemilangan” yang pernah dicipta Saiful Bukhari suatu masa dahulu.
Saiful Bukhari mungkin tidak perlu diperkenalkan lagi kepada pelajar-pelajar Uniten. Memulakan rentak seorang pemimpin sewaktu dipilih sebagai Ketua Pengarah Program Bakti Siswa Kemerdekaan 2006 ternyata memang menjulang nama beliau. Walaubagaimanapun tidak ramai yang tahu hakikat sebenar. Tentang ketelusan, kejujuran, dan sikap tanggungjawabnya sebelum, semasa dan selepas tamat program. Hampir dua tahun berlalu, tetapi saya masih jelas dengan semua cerita.
Tidak cukup dengan portfolio Ketua Pengarah Program yang hanya dianjurkan setahun sekali, Saiful kemudiannya merancang untuk tampak lebih berkaliber, lebih berkuasa. Dia kemudiannya bertanding di dalam pemilihan Majlis Perwakilan Pelajar sesi 2006/2007. Dengan bilangan undi yang tidak boleh dibanggakan, beliau berjaya. Beliau dikatakan mempengaruhi beberapa ahli perwakilan lain untuk mengundi beliau sebagai Presiden (baca:PRESIDEN).
Namun demikian, rezekinya sudah ditentukan untuk hanya menjadi Timbalan Presiden. Dia akhirnya terbang ke Filipina untuk menghadiri sebuah seminar anjuran Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi. Pelik tetapi benar. Seharusnya yang terbang adalah Presiden bukan Timbalan Presiden. Mungkinkah Saiful menggunakan aksesnya sebagai Pemuda UMNO atau agen orang kenamaan untuk melayakkan diri untuk mewakili seluruh institusi pengajian swasta? Dan episod kegemilangannya bermula setelah dia kembali ke tanah air.
Seperti seekor musang yang tidak pernah bersyukur dengan rezekinya, begitulah juga Saiful Bukhari. Portfolio sebagai Timbalan Presiden nyata tidak memberi kepuasan kepadanya untuk menjadi orang yang paling berkuasa. Entah di mana silapnya, Saiful tidak mempedulikan sama sekali tugas dan tanggungjawabnya sebagai wakil suara mahasiswa UNITEN.
Jangankan tugas sebagai pemimpin, malah tugas sebagai mahasiswa juga diabaikan. Tetapi dalam pada masa yang sama, saya dimaklumkan oleh teman dari IPTA lain bahawa mereka kerap bertemu dengan Saiful, menghadiri beberapa perjumpaan pemimpin Institusi Pengajian Tinggi. Saya terkejut pada mulanya.
Bagaimana anda boleh menghadiri perjumpaan yang membincangkan tentang nasib dan masa depan mahasiswa seluruh Malaysia sedangkan anda mengabaikan tugas utama anda, iaitu menjaga kebajikan mahasiswa Universiti Tenaga Nasional?
Bertambah kekok apabila mendengar Saiful Bukhari ini memperkenalkan dirinya sebagai Presiden @ Yang diPertua (YDP) Universiti Tenaga Nasional. Bukankah ini tanda-tanda awal dia sememangnya gila kuasa?
Saiful Bukhari ini juga dilihat sebagai seorang yang gila publisiti. Dia hanya akan “bertanggungjawab” sekiranya program tersebut mendapat liputan media, akhbar dan orang kenamaan. Oleh sebab itu, beliau hanya memilih untuk menjadi Penasihat program. Untung kerana tidak perlu bekerja keras memikirkan flow program, penyediaan kertas kerja dan pelaksanaan program. Yang dia tahu cumalah - pasti dia akan ditemuramah dan namanya pasti terpampang di dada akhbar.
Dan hari ini saya kira, cita-citanya untuk menjadi seorang “star” sudah tercapai. Kemusykilan saya semakin berganda apabila ditengah-tengah kempen PRU 12 yang lalu, dia berjaya menempelkan diri di setiap roadshow ceramah DSAI. Bagaimana tidak musykil, sedangkan beberapa hari sebelum itu, dia menghulurkan pelawaan kepada saya di laman Friendster, untuk bersama-samanya mengundi Barisan Nasional! Mungkin dia tidak tahu bahawa prinsip dan pendirian saya tidak serapuh dia.
Alasannya hanyalah sekadar membantu seorang teman menguruskan hal-hal berkaitan di Pejabat DSAI langsung tidak masuk akal. Peralihan parti politik Saiful Bukhari ketika itu hanya mengundang bahana. Siapa tidak kenal Saiful Bukhari? Pendusta yang bermuka-muka.
Dia tampil menjawab dengan menyatakan bahawa dia bakal melanjutkan pelajaran di sebuah akademi penerbangan. Satu persoalan, atas pembiayaan siapa?
Mungkinkah kerana ingin menyelamatkan sang ketua, maruah sendiri sanggup dilapah. itulah harga kesetiaan yang perlu dibayar Saiful Bukhari. Menyelitkan diri di kawasan musuh dan akhirnya leher sendiri yang ditetak. Saya amat bersimpati jika inilah yang dicari-cari oleh manusia bernama Saiful Bukhari selama ini.
Kebimbangan kami nyata berasas. Saiful Bukhari telah mengeluarkan taringnya di saat-saat DSAI mula meletakkan kepercayaan ke atas dirinya. Saya mengakui kepintaran bermain yang dimiliki Saiful Bukhari, tetapi saya juga ingin ingatkan, sepandai-pandai tupai melompat akhirnya pasti akan tersungkur ke tanah. Buat Saiful Bukhari (jika anda membaca kenyataan saya ini), well done. Takziah juga buat keluarganya, adik perempuannya, dan alfatihah buat allahyarhamah bondanya.
Pautan lain:Penafian DSAI Laporan polis terhadap Anwar atas dakwaan liwat PKR: Nyawa Anwar dalam bahaya
Nota: Saya bertanggungjawab di atas setiap kenyataan dan ulasan saya mengenai Saiful Bukhari. Daripada dituduh pengecut dan tidak mampu membenarkan kebenaran dizahirkan, saya mengambil risiko ini. Saya tidak mungkin dapat membuktikan bahawa DSAI tidak melakukan perbuatan tersebut, tetapi sekurang-kurangnya kenyataan saya dan ulasan-ulasan pelajar Uniten lain dapat memberi gambaran awal mengenai siapa Saiful Bukhari ini. Saya tidak terkejut dia mampu bertindak sampai ke tahap ini. Saya tidak terkejut dengan kisah dia menikam kawan sendiri dari belakang demi mencapai kemahuannya. Malah saya tidak terkejut jika Saiful tampil dengan kenyataan bahawa dia dipergunakan untuk menutup keaiban ketuanya satu hari nanti.

-----------------
* Tajuk asal artikel ini adalah Saiful Bukhari - AdminKN

SAIFUL ADA HUBUNGAN DENGAN ROSMAH-KATA ANWAR

'Saiful ada pertemuan sulit dengan Rosmah berulang kali' - Anwar
Azamin Amin Foto Wan Zahari Wan Salleh
Wed Jul 02, 08 1:49:57 am MYT
KUALA LUMPUR, 1 Julai (Hrkh) - Penasihat KeADILan Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim memberitahu bahawa bekas pembantu beliau Saiful Bukhari Azlan yang membuat dakwaan liwat terhadapnya mempunyai hubungan rapat dengan Timbalan Perdana Menteri Dato' Seri Najib Tun Razak dan isterinya Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor.

"Saiful ada pertemuan sulit dengan Rosmah berulang kali malah ada SD (Surat Akuan Bersumpah) tentang apa yang berlaku di pejabat Timbalan Perdana Menteri itu," katanya dalam satu sidang media di pejabat KeADILan jam 3.45 petang tadi.

Beliau mengadakan sidang media tersebut sebaik sahaja pulang dari ibu pejabat kontijen polis Selangor kerana memberi keterangan dan laporan terhadap Ketua Polis Negara Tan Sri Musa Hassan dan Peguam Negara Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail.

Menemani beliau ialah beberapa peguam dan pemimpin KeADILan seperti Naib Presiden Sivarasa Rasiah, Bendahari parti William Leong dan Ketua Angkatan Muda Shamsul Iskandar Md Akin.

Turut hadir, ahli parlimen Padang Serai Gobalakrisnan dan exco kerajaan Selangor dan juga ahli majlis pimpinan tertinggi parti itu, Dr Xavier Jayakumar termasuk hampir 50 orang penyokong Anwar berada di luar pintu masuk IPKS.

Dalam pada itu beberapa ahli-ahli parlimen PKR termasuk anaknya Nurul Izzah Anwar hadir di depan pintu dan dihalang masuk ke ibu pejabat polis tersebut sehingga menimbulkan sedikit kekecohan dengan anggota polis untuk beberapa minit ketika ketibaan Anwar.

Anwar dan para penyokongnya meninggalkan bangunan IPKS jam 3.20 petang dan menuju ke ibu pejabat parti di Tropicana, Petaling Jaya.

Dalam sidang media itu juga, beliau sekali lagi menafikan dakwaan yang dibuat oleh Saiful tersebut dan mempunyai bukti kukuh dan alibi yang boleh mengaitkan tentang insiden berkenaan namun Anwar berkata beliau akan mendedahkan dakwaannya itu dalam masa terdekat.

"Saya ingin memberi amaran dan ingatan agar jangan sesiapa mengulangi konspirasi jahat ini," tegas di hadapan puluhan wartawan dalam dan luar negara.

Beliau juga menafikan Mohd Saiful seorang pegawai peribadinya dan akan menjelaskan pada jangka masa terdekat tentang tarikh dan tempat kejadian itu yang dikaitkan dengan beliau.

"Perkara itu tidak berlaku. Saya mempunyai bukti kukuh dan alibi tentang kes ini," katanya

Sementara itu satu ceramah penjelasan isu menggemparkan ini akan diadakan di Stadium Melawati, Shah Alam pada 8.30 malam ini yang bakal dihadari oleh Anwar sendiri. _

ANWAR LODGE REPORT AGAINST IGP, AG-MALAYSIAKINI

Anwar lodges report against IGP, AG
Jul 1, 08 12:56pm
PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim today lodged a police report against police chief Musa Hassan and attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail for allegedly fabricating evidence in his trials 10 years ago.
MCPX
Anwar arrived at the Selangor state police headquarters in Shah Alam at about 2.50pm, accompanied by his lawyer Sankara Nair.Four of his party leaders, including vice president R Sivarasa and treasurer William Leong, had arrived much earlier at about 2.20pm and waited for Anwar to come to lodge the report.Outside the station, several other party leaders, including two of PKR's MPs N Gobalakrishnan and Yusmadi Yusoff, were disappointed that they weren't allowed into the station to accompany Anwar to lodge the report.
Even Anwar's daughter Nurul Izzah was not allowed into the station, creating some tension at the entrance. The police said that they would only allow five people in to lodge the report.
Some 30 supporters had also gathered outside the station.
After some 30 minutes, Anwar left the station - at about 3.20pm - to the PKR headquarters in Tropicana, Petaling Jaya where he is expected to hold a press conference.
Rally tonight
Anwar had earlier said that he had evidence implicating the inspector-general of police and attorney-general in the misconduct, including fabrication of evidence in the cases launched against him after his sacking from government.At that time, police chief Musa was the investigating officer of the charges against Anwar while AG Gani Patail was the chief prosecutor.
He added that a new police report lodged against him for sodomy was a result of "interested parties to attack me in retaliation" over this evidence in his possession.The report alleging sodomy was filed by Anwar's aide, 23-year-old Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, last Saturday.Anwar claimed that the fresh accusation against him was a "complete fabrication".Later tonight, PKR plans to hold a rally at the Stadium Melawati in Shah Alam, scheduled to kick off at 8.30pm.
[More to follow]

A CRAZY WEEKEND IN KUALA LUMPUR

A crazy weekend in Kuala Lumpur
Anwar emerged from the Turkish embassy yesterday evening. I didn’t think he could stay in there for long, given that it would have created a major diplomatic stand-off between the two countries. Farish Noor was in KL over the weekend - and returned to Singapore feeling deeply concerned about events in the capital. This article was originally meant to go on the Aliran website, but the website has gone down due to a sudden surge around the same time Anwar walked out of the embassy. (Update: The website has now been restored. According to the webhosting service’s support, the website came under attack from two IP addresses, which bombarded the website with close to 60,000 hits.) So here’s guest writer Farish making a special appearance on this blog with his take of events over the weekend:
A crazy weekend
By Farish A Noor
Its been a long time since I’ve had a weekend as crazy as the one that has just passed. Travelling back to KL by bus I was looking forward to a relaxed weekend with my significant other, and to giving the odd lecture or two in the process. What was meant to be a nice, relaxing break from my work after taking part in a strenuous conference on transnationalism and religion turned out to be a kafka-esque moment extended over 48 hours, from which I am reeling till now.
For a start, the public forum on the Social Contract organised by the Bar Council which I took part in attracted more controversy than was warranted. How odd that in this day and age, when Malaysia is half a decade old, discussion on things as mundane as the social contract - that would have been a catalyst for yawns and snores in any other country - could have been seen as something so controversial that it even warranted more than a minute of news coverage the next day. Dazed and flabbergasted by the reaction of some, I found comfort in the words of the President of the Bar Council, who reminded us all that we, Malaysians, are now a mature and civil society where we can speak of such things in an intelligent, rational and objective manner.
Three hours later I found myself at a public reading at a gallery in Bangsar where my better half was reading an excerpt from her newly-published book. She chose to read an article on the fate of our fellow Malaysian citizen Lina Joy, and I was struck by the appreciation and goodwill of those present who listened to her attentively and congratulated her for writing what she did. It was a mixed gathering that indicated to me that a new, brave and bold young Malaysia was in the process of being born. The hall was full of Malaysians from all walks of life; the young and old, Malaysians of every conceivable ethnic, linguistic, cultural, religious and class background. And yet there we were: the Malaysia of today, mixed and complex, hybrid and confident of our plural identity. How wonderful to live in such a country, where newness is still not a distant dream and renewal a constant possibility.
I felt proud to be a Malaysian then, and proud to be among other Malaysian-minded Malaysians who were colour-blind and open to dialogue and engagement in the most meaningful sense of the word.
The very next day I woke up to a flurry of sms-es informing me that Anwar Ibrahim had taken refuge in the Turkish embassy and that a police report had been filed against him on the charge of sodomy. My immediate reaction was one of disbelief. What?? Again?? Were some of my friends playing a sick joke on me, on a Sunday morning to boot?
Apparently not. And in the course of the day dozens of sms-es invaded the small confine of my handphone to keep me updated on what was going on and things were going pear-shaped very fast. At this stage, it is too early to predict what will happen as a result of these allegations, but by the end of the day I found myself besieged by calls from TV and radio stations the world over for comments on the events as they unfolded. As was the case in 1998, Anwar is back in the headlines all over the world for all the wrong reasons.
Thus it has come to pass that we in Malaysia are witnessing the slow and painful birth of a new Malaysia where the forces of change are constantly having to struggle against the forces of inertia and reaction. There is no need to dwell on the nature of the charges or how this latest episode of Malaysia’s political drama will play out; suffice to say that the convulsions will be long and laborious, as in the case of any birth.
What is clear, however, is this: In every single conversation I had with every single Malaysian I met in KL and on my way back to my office in Singapore, I was confronted with the same statement repeated ad infinitum: We don’t believe it. If the charges in 1998 were false, why should they be true today? Faith, it should be noted, is not merely a matter of religion but also of politics; and in politics political credibility counts for everything. Over the past ten years the reputation of Malaysia’s governmental, judicial and security institutions have taken such a battering that public confidence is at an all-time low.
I will not entertain the many conspiracy theories that are making the rounds at the moment as I have grown tired and immune to them, as most Malaysians have I’m sure. But the political scientist in me is worried about what all this may do to our common faith in the idea of Malaysia itself, and whether the Malaysian project can sustain such battering for much longer. Others, like my friends Haris Ibrahim and Malik Imtiaz, have already beaten me to the keyboard and raised questions that need to be asked concerning this latest political hot potato. The timing, context and purpose of these revelations and accusations have been questioned by some. And we have also been reminded of the wider context against which this is all happening, at a time when allegations made about those who may or may not have been involved and present at the brutal slaying of the Mongolian woman Altantuya were already making the rounds on the internet and grabbing the headlines of the mainstream press.
I can only concur with the opinion of Malik Imtiaz when he raises the pertinent and timely point: “Somehow, the sexual proclivities of an individual, whether real or fantasised, do not seem to matter when the country is facing a financial crisis largely due to fat cats having looted and pillaged their way through national resources, seemingly at will”, while “Morgan Stanley has indicated that some RM330 billion has been dissipated from Malaysia through corruption falls even lower on the list of priorities (if it was on the list at all)”.
Enough said, I think.