
Aliran media statementhttp://www.aliran.com

After Penanti, yet another by-election?
I refer to Malaysiakini report
BN may not contest Penati says PM.To fight or not to fight. For the first time in our country's history, Umno has deemed it fit to consider not entering the ring for the vacant Penati seat as they will be the underdog against their PKR opponent. Surely after losing four straight by-elections in the peninsula, BN cannot afford to lose another by-election in Penati which is a PKR stronghold as the seat is under Permatang Pauh which is held by the de facto Pakatan Rakyat supremo, Anwar Ibrahim. It will be a suicidal attempt by the Umno candidate to go into the lion's den against their PKR opponent as the BN candidate will surely lose. The tide against the present government still remains unabated as the last four by-elections have shown.
Najib Razak, the newly-minted prime minister, must have read the sentiment on the ground correctly when he mentioned that BN might boycott the coming by-election in Penanti as it will be a waste of public funds for them to go ahead and contest. But he was less truthful when he says that by-elections should only be held due to the death or bankruptcy of the incumbents which render the seats vacant under the law. If BN had a chance of winning in the opposition stronghold of Penati, they will surely have their candidate fight for the seat. Our parliamentary law says when the incumbent lawmakers in the state assembly or parliament resign from office on their own free will, by-elections should be held within sixty days and the incumbents are barred from re-contesting the same seat for a period of two years. Unlike the US where when senators or congressmen resign or die in office, there won't be another by-election but their seats will be filled by the party they represented.
Maybe our election laws should be changed to follow the US system to stop the wastage of public funds in holding by-elections in the future. Surely under normal circumstances, with the government machinery at its disposal and election goodies that can be thrown at voters, the present government would be more than willing to take part in any by-election in order to increase their majority in the state assemblies or Parliament. Prior to the 2008 general elections, BN candidates normally won any by-election against their opposition rivals. But that was before as circumstances have changed in the opposition's favour as BN seems to have lost the people's support, losing four by-elections straight in the row in the past six months.PKR, the new kid on the block, seems to have many internal problems as compared to their Pakatan partners DAP and PAS.
Since winning big in the last general elections, their lawmakers have not been up to mark as one seat after another became vacant.Prior to that, two of their assembly persons from Perak were charged with corrupt practices and were subsequently charged in court for their abuse of power. Another bigwig in Penang had to leave his deputy chief minister's post due to inept leadership and he is also involved in a controversy which might land him in court if the MACC decides to charge him for graft. If Anwar Ibrahim and PKR are not careful and other lawmakers from the party resign due to personal reasons, the public might think that their elected representatives are not up to mark and the tide might turn against them. By-elections should be held for good reasons and not because the incumbents are beset with personal problems which can affect their work in their constituency.
As it is, right now, the people would rather have their lawmakers look into the state of the economy rather than having by-elections here and there which seem to be becoming a regular event.PKR cannot expect the people's support for them remain the same if dirty laundry among their party members are exposed to the public every now and then. PKR members, especially their law- makers, should have the discipline like their DAP and PAS counterparts.
Hopefully, the by-election at Penanti will be the last by-election due to the resignation of the incumbent for personal reasons. By-election fatigue seems to have crept in amongst the public who are more worried about their thinning wallets and do not want to be distracted by too many by-elections.
Mindraf: Does M'sia need another sectarian political party?

Malaysia does not need another communitarian party that caters to the primary concerns of a particular ethnic or religious community, says Farish A Noor. We already forced have too many parties based on ethnic and religious loyalties, and yet another sectarian party like Mindraf will hardly bring us any closer to a Malaysia where identity is based on universal citizenship and equal rights.
As if the political landscape of Malaysia wasn't overcrowded already, there has come into the fray yet another sectarian community-based party, Mindraf (Malaysian Indian Democratic Action Front). Ostensibly set up by 'good samaritans' concerned about the plight of their community, Mindraf has announced its political ambitions with the aim of representing Malaysian citizens of South Asian origin.Now allow me to be blunt here: Malaysia does not need another communitarian party that caters to the primary concerns of a particular ethnic or religious community.
Will Dr M be a liability to new PM?

Najib has to decide whether to heed former PM's call to contest Penanti by-election
April 23, 2009


WHILE some in Umno may have been hopeful that ex-premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad's return to the party will bring back some public support, analysts are not so sure.
According to liberal news portal Malaysian Insider, Dr Mahathir will become a liability to Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak's fledgling leadership despite being instrumental in his rise to power.
It said yesterday that Dr Mahathir's zealous call for Barisan Nasional (BN) to contest in the Penanti by-election has divided Umno and added unnecessary pressure on Mr Najib, who had mooted the possibility of BN not fielding a candidate.

Prime Minister Najib now appears stuck with the headache of either accommodating the powerful and influential former PM or maintaining an image of a leader capable of making his own decisions.
Mr Ibrahim Suffian from the independent Merdeka Center told The Malaysian Insider: 'There is a possibility that it will keep recurring given how influential Mahathir is in Umno. Mahathir can be a very damaging factor to Umno and Najib, but he can also be a positive one as well.
'Whether they like it or not, Mahathir is extremely influential and he was the guy who recently shaped the country's history and the political landscape is made in such a way that Umno will definitely have to stick with him for the coming years.'
Falling out with Dr Mahathir, the longest serving leader in Malaysia's history, can be politically fatal as can be seen with the ousting of former Umno president and prime minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.
And in the case of the Penanti by-election in Pennang, Dr Mahathir is showing signs that he is still keen on flexing his muscles to influence Umno's direction, which means that PM Najib must find ways to accommodate the former premier's views to avoid upsetting his endorser.
That means Mr Najib will now have to deal with DrMahathir's influence and external pressures from opposition party Pakatan Rakyat (PR).
Political scientist Dr Mustapha Ismail of Universiti Utara Malaysia said that while it was right for a leader who helmed the party for 22 years to express his views, it was also tactically apt for the former Umno president to be 'a bit more careful' with what he says publicly.
His statement on the Penanti by-election has left Mr Najib facing a situation where he is forced to make a decision that may not please either and also split in the party further.
Said Dr Mustapha: 'On one side, Najib has to think about Mahathir, but at the same time, he would not want to be seen as a leader bowing down to Mahathir's wishes. This is certainly a difficult time for Najib but he has to take the risk and be firm.
'But the key indicator as to whether or not Mahathir is keen on exerting his influence on Umno is how he would react to Najib should he decide not to contest in the Penanti by-elections. This is definitely an interesting episode,' said Dr Mustapha, who believes Mr Najib would most likely listen to his BN peers and decide not to contest against PKR at the Penanti polls.
Advice, not demand
Another political analyst and associate professor with Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Dr Agus Yusof, felt Dr Mahathir did not make such statements with the intention of meddling with Mr Najib's leadership.
'I think the statement made by Mahathir was done in the spirit of strengthening Umno and BN. Unlike popular opinion, what he said was not a demand but more of an advice.
'Should Najib decide not to contest there, I don't think Mahathir would lash out against him,' said Dr Agus.
Mr Najib is expected to announce BN's decision on fielding a candidate in three days' time when the supreme council convenes.
Adding pressure to his decision is a survey done by Permatang Pauh Umno division that found that the grassroots sentiments in Penanti were mixed and many were without any clear political preference, said liberal news portal Malaysiakini.
Said Mr Abdul Jalil, a former Penanti assemblyman: 'Our survey revealed that there is no clear direction on which the voters would vote.
'Thus, Umno has a fighting chance to regain the seat.'
FAIRUS BEBAS TUDUHAN RASUAH

Tazkirah Jumaat: Mengapa Muslim biarkan hati mati
Ustaz Zainudin Hashim
Hati adalah organ paling utama dalam tubuh manusia dan ia nikmat paling agung diberikan Allah. Hati menjadi tempat Allah membuat penilaian terhadap hamba-Nya. Pada hatilah letaknya niat seseorang.
Iklan
Niat ikhlas itu akan diberi pahala. Hati perlu dijaga dan dipelihara dengan baik agar tidak rosak, sakit, buta, keras dan lebih-lebih lagi tidak mati. Sekiranya berlaku pada hati keadaan seperti ini, kesannya membabitkan seluruh anggota tubuh manusia. Akibatnya, akan lahir penyakit masyarakat berpunca daripada hati yang sudah rosak itu.
Justeru, hati menjadi amanah yang wajib dijaga sebagaimana kita diamanahkan menjaga mata, telinga, mulut, kaki, tangan dan sebagainya daripada berbuat dosa dan maksiat.
Hati yang hitam ialah hati yang menjadi gelap kerana bergelumang dengan dosa. Setiap dosa yang dilakukan tanpa bertaubat akan menyebabkan satu titik hitam pada hati. Itu baru satu dosa. Bayangkan bagaimana kalau 10 dosa? 100 dosa? 1,000 dosa? Alangkah hitam dan kotornya hati ketika itu.
Perkara ini jelas digambarkan melalui hadis Rasulullah yang bermaksud: "Sesiapa yang melakukan satu dosa, maka akan tumbuh pada hatinya setitik hitam, sekiranya dia bertaubat akan terkikislah titik hitam itu daripada hatinya. Jika dia tidak bertaubat maka titik hitam itu akan terus merebak hingga seluruh hatinya menjadi hitam." (Hadis riwayat Ibn Majah)
Hadis ini selari dengan firman Allah bermaksud: "Sebenarnya ayat-ayat Kami tidak ada cacatnya, bahkan mata hati mereka sudah diselaputi kotoran dosa dengan sebab perbuatan kufur dan maksiat yang mereka kerjakan." (Surah al-Muthaffifiin, ayat 14)
Hati yang kotor dan hitam akan menjadi keras. Apabila hati keras, kemanisan dan kelazatan beribadat tidak dapat dirasakan. Ia akan menjadi penghalang kepada masuknya nur iman dan ilmu. Belajar sebanyak mana pun ilmu yang bermanfaat atau ilmu yang boleh memandu kita, namun ilmu itu tidak masuk ke dalam hati, kalau pun kita faham, tidak ada daya dan kekuatan untuk mengamalkannya.
Dalam hal ini Allah berfirman yang bermaksud: "Kemudian selepas itu, hati kamu menjadi keras seperti batu, bahkan lebih keras lagi. Pada hal antara batu-batu itu ada yang terpancar dan mengalir sungai daripadanya dan ada pula antaranya yang pecah-pecah terbelah lalu keluar mata air daripadanya. Dan ada juga antaranya yang jatuh ke bawah kerana takut kepada Allah sedang Allah tidak sekali-kali lalai daripada apa yang kamu kerjakan." (Surah al-Baqarah ayat 74)
Begitulah Allah mendatangkan contoh dan menerangkan batu yang keras itu pun ada kalanya boleh mengalirkan air dan boleh terpecah kerana amat takutkan Allah. Oleh itu, apakah hati manusia lebih keras daripada batu hingga tidak boleh menerima petunjuk dan hidayah daripada Allah.
Perkara paling membimbangkan ialah apabila hati mati akan berlaku kemusnahan amat besar terhadap manusia. Matinya hati adalah bencana dan malapetaka besar yang bakal menghitamkan seluruh kehidupan. Inilah akibatnya apabila kita lalai dan cuai mengubati dan membersihkan hati. Kegagalan kita menghidupkan hati akan dipertanggungjawabkan Allah pada hari akhirat kelak.
Kenapa hati mati? Hati mati disebabkan perkara berikut:
* Hati mati kerana tidak berfungsi mengikut perintah Allah iaitu tidak mengambil iktibar dan pengajaran daripada didikan dan ujian Allah.
Allah berfirman bermaksud: "Maka kecelakaan besarlah bagi orang yang keras membatu hatinya daripada menerima peringatan yang diberi oleh Allah. Mereka yang demikian keadaannya adalah dalam kesesatan yang nyata." (Surah al-Zumar ayat 22)
* Hati juga mati jika tidak diberikan makanan dan santapan rohani dengan sewajarnya. Kalau tubuh badan boleh mati kerana tuannya tidak makan dan tidak minum, begitu juga hati.
Apabila ia tidak diberikan santapan dan tidak diubati, ia bukan saja akan sakit dan buta, malah akan mati akhirnya. Santapan rohani yang dimaksudkan itu ialah zikrullah dan muhasabah diri.
Oleh itu, jaga dan peliharalah hati dengan sebaik-baiknya supaya tidak menjadi kotor, hitam, keras, sakit, buta dan mati. Gilap dan bersihkannya dengan cara banyak mengingati Allah (berzikir).
Firman Allah bermaksud: "Iaitu orang yang beriman dan tenteram hati mereka dengan mengingati Allah. Ketahuilah! Dengan mengingati Allah itu tenang tenteramlah hati manusia." (Surah al-Ra'd ayat 28)
Firman-Nya lagi bermaksud: "Hari yang padanya harta benda dan anak-anak tidak dapat memberikan sebarang pertolongan, kecuali harta benda dan anak-anak orang yang datang menghadap Allah dengan hati yang selamat sejahtera daripada syirik dan munafik." (Surah al-Syura ayat 88-89)
Tanda-tanda hati mati
Menurut Syeikh Ibrahim Adham, antara sebab atau tanda-tanda hati mati ialah:
1. Mengaku kenal Allah SWT, tetapi tidak menunaikan hak-hak-Nya.
2. Mengaku cinta kepada Rasulullah s.a.w., tetapi mengabaikan sunnah baginda.
3. Membaca al-Quran, tetapi tidak beramal dengan hukum-hukum di dalamnya.
4. Memakan nikmat-nikmat Allah SWT, tetapi tidak mensyukuri atas pemberian-Nya.
5. Mengaku syaitan itu musuh, tetapi tidak berjuang menentangnya.
6. Mengaku adanya nikmat syurga, tetapi tidak beramal untuk mendapatkannya.
7. Mengaku adanya seksa neraka, tetapi tidak berusaha untuk menjauhinya.
8. Mengaku kematian pasti tiba bagi setiap jiwa, tetapi masih tidak bersedia untuknya.
9. Menyibukkan diri membuka keaiban orang lain, tetapi lupa akan keaiban diri sendiri.
10. Menghantar dan menguburkan jenazah/mayat saudara se-Islam, tetapi tidak mengambil pengajaran daripadanya. Semoga dengan panduan yang di sampaikan itu akan dapat kita sama-sama mengambil iktibar semoga segala apa yang kita kerjakan akan diredai Allah SWT.
Menurut Sheikh Ibni Athoillah Iskandari dalam kalam hikmahnya yang berikutnya;
Sebahagian�daripada tanda mati hati itu ialah jika tidak merasa dukacita kerana tertinggal sesuatu amal perbuatan kebajikan juga tidak menyesal jika terjadi berbuat sesuatu pelanggaran dosa.
Mati hati itu adalah kerana tiga perkara iaitu;
* Hubbul dunia (kasihkan dunia)
* Lalai daripada zikirullah (mengingati Allah)
* Membanyakkan makan dan menjatuhkan�anggota badan kepada maksiat kepada Allah.
Hidup hati itu kerana tiga perkara iaitu;
*� Zuhud dengan dunia
* Zikrullah
*� Bergaul atau berkawan dengan aulia Allah. - lanh � _
Malaysia’s Crooked Bridge rears its ugly head once more

Malaysia’s Crooked Bridge rears its ugly head once more
Posted By: The Asia File at Apr 20, 2009 at 16:42:34 [General]
Posted in: Business
View More
crooked bridge, economy, Mahathir Mohamad, malaysia, Najib Razak, recession , singapore, Transport
Of all the harebrained schemes that have ever been dreamt up by egotistical political leaders, former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad's plan for a "crooked bridge" linking peninsula Malaysia with Singapore surely ranks among the most bizarre (see artist's impression).
And, as the 83- year-old Mahathir has drifted back onto the political scene after his ally Najib Razak took the reins of power last month, so the vexed issue of the crooked bridge has reared up once more.
The existing main causeway linking northern Singapore with the city of Johor Bahru in Malaysia is far too narrow and is plagued by traffic jams and long delays, particularly at the weekend and on public holidays.
Mahathir, who showed a persistent fondness for massive infrastructure projects during his 22 years in office, wanted to build a much wider bridge over the straits of Johor but could not convince a Singaporean government that he had often purposefully antagonised to reach agreement with him.
His proposed solution was to unilaterally build a new bridge over the Malaysian half of the straits, which would connect to the old Singaporean causeway at the halfway point.
Because Mahathir also wanted to boost Malaysia's burgeoning ports by allowing ships to pass under the bridge instead of being forced to re-route all the way round Singapore, the bridge would have to be curved in shape to allow for the road to gain the necessary height in such a short distance.
About a week ago, reports started surfacing in the Malaysian newspapers, which are almost all controlled by members of the ruling coalition and their allies, of calls for the crooked bridge plan, which was jettisoned by Mahathir 's successor Abdullah Badawi, to be resurrected.
That got people talking and now Mahathir has fanned the flames himself in a rather cryptic post on his blog entitled "The Crooked Bridge", which is a response to the calls for the project to be revisited.
"Does the Government need to ask Singapore for permission to build the now desirable crooked bridge?" he writes. "Is Malaysia free to do things in its own territory? Are we really independent? I wonder."
As this article on Asia Sentinel (which I also write for) explains, Mahathir's return to the political fold has a number of implications, including the very real possibility that some of the cash from Malaysia's massive fiscal stimulus plan (9pc of GDP) is channeled into the sort of grandiose projects that he champions.
The major concern about such "visionary" plans in Malaysia has always been that the juicy government contracts that are generated end up in the hands of those closest to the politicians in power rather than those best placed to complete the project on time and on budget.
Hence, the old joke about the crooked bridge being designed to represent the true nature of Malaysia-Singapore relations: Singapore is straight and Malaysia is crooked.
Government vs Mafia

By Wong Chin Huat
editor@thenutgraph.com
WE are now told by the new Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak that by-elections are bad because they distract us from dealing with the economic crisis.
Tunku Abdul Rahman (Public
domain)This aversion towards elections is nothing new to Malaysia. In the spirit of learning our national history, let's revisit some past decisions made by Alliance/Barisan Nasional (BN) leaders.
The BN's track record
In March 1965, Tunku terminated local elections, which were mostly won by opposition parties, especially in the urban centres. Tunku promised to restore local elections once the Indonesian Confrontation was over. Of course, he never did. Neither did his five successors. Their reason? Elections are a waste of money.
Lee Kuan Yew (Public domain) In August 1965, Tunku expelled Singapore from the federation of Malaysia because Singapore Premier Lee Kuan Yew — like Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim 43 years later — was actively courting East Malaysians to challenge Umno rule. To be fair to Tunku, his Umno colleagues actually wanted a more repressive solution — Internal Security Act (ISA) detention for Lee and his People's Action Party lieutenants.
In 1966, Sarawak Chief Minister Datuk Stephen Kalong Ningkan — from the Sarawak National Party (SNAP) — was ousted unconstitutionally following dubious defections, much like Perak's Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin 43 years later. When the Borneo High Court ruled to reinstate Ningkan, he wanted to let the people decide.
However, before Ningkan could dissolve the legislature, the Tunku administration proclaimed emergency rule in Sarawak. The Federal and Sarawak constitutions were amended so that a motion of no-confidence could be passed and a more compliant chief minister appointed.
Mustapha Harun (Public
domain) The late Tun Mustapha Harun was allied to Tunku and also avoided elections in Sabah. In 1969, when the Malaya Alliance struggled to hold onto power, Mustapha's Sabah Alliance bagged the state's 16 seats through "walkovers". In later years, he even contemplated making himself a sultan.
Tun Abdul Razak also had his moments in outmanoeuvring the electoral process. He expressed an aversion to "politicking" and preferred to focus on administration and development. After 1969, he gradually co-opted all but two parliamentary opposition parties, DAP and SNAP, first into coalition governments and later in 1974 into the BN.
His reward? A total of 47 walkovers or 31% of parliamentary seats in the 1974 elections.
In 1974, Razak also carved Chinese-Malaysian-majority Kuala Lumpur out of Selangor presumably to ensure that opposition parties like the DAP could never capture the state. The new Federal Territory was not to have its own state government, or any elected government for that matter.
Hussein Onn (Public domain) Razak's successor, Tun Hussein Onn, took a slightly different tack when faced with political difficulties. For example, he declared an emergency and imposed direct rule in Kelantan in 1977 when PAS, then a member of BN, tried to oust their own menteri besar, Datuk Mohamad Nasir, who was much-liked by Umno. Hussein lifted the emergency and went to polls four months later when Umno had strengthened its base. Umno and Nasir's splinter party, Berjasa, eventually thrashed PAS in the election.
While elections under Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad were arguably never free or fair, he was particularly innovative in his own party's elections. In 1988, he effectively purged Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah's supporters, by triggering the deregistration of Umno and the creation of Umno Baru. To protect the incumbents, Mahathir introduced the quota for nominations for the presidency and other senior positions, which Najib now proposes to remove.
In 1994, Anwar, then deputy prime minister and Umno deputy president, brought down the Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) state government through mass defections of lawmakers within a month after elections. Denying the use of financial inducement and coercive measures, Anwar recently reiterated that he merely "invited" those defectors. Of course, no fresh elections were called.
Musa Hitam (Source: vod.uum.
edu.my)One BN leader who made markedly different decisions was former Deputy Prime Minister Tun Musa Hitam. As the acting prime minister in 1985, he prevented Tun Mustapha's plot to install himself as Sabah chief minister despite not having a legislative majority, through — yes, even then — a palace coup.
But Musa's decision can be seen to be the exception rather than the rule in the BN's elections track record.
In February 2009, Najib orchestrated the downfall of Perak's elected government and installed Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir as menteri besar.
While Anwar's Pakatan Rakyat (PR) has no legal or moral ground to protest the defections in Perak, why didn't the BN subsequently allow for a fresh poll?
Their answer is the usual — elections are disruptive and wasteful, and now bad for the economy.
Why are elections a must?
Why must we have elections to decide our governments?
Why can't we opt for horse-trading among lawmakers; palace coups; the rule of judges; military coups; mutinying police officers; mutinying bureaucracies; or mob rule à la Thailand's People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD) as alternatives to topple and install governments?
PAD supporters armed with makeshift batons and golf clubs, 2008
(Pic by Mark Micallef, source: Wikipedia commons)
Provided the people do not protest, these methods may well be much smoother, more efficient, peaceful and attractive to certain types of investors.
So, why must the so-called liberal democrats and constitutional monarchists protest?
The answer, in a nutshell, is that elections distinguish a government from a mafia or triad.
A state is similar to the underworld in three senses: (a) they extract money; (b) they control territory; and (c) those living on their territories cannot opt out from being their subjects.
Tilly (Source: columbia.edu) Why do governments fight against foreign countries (war-making), suppress domestic rebels and outlaws (state-making) and offer law and order for their subjects (protection)? So that they may have the power to extract their subjects' resources (extraction).
Charles Tilly, the American sociologist, called a spade a spade: war-making and state-making are but organised crimes. Four centuries before him, Tang Zhen, a Chinese thinker in Imperial China, called emperors thieves who fed on their subjects.
It is clear that in political theory, there is only a thin line between a government and a mafia or triad. While a government collects "taxes", a mafia or triad collects "protection fees". Sometimes, the mafia or triad is the government and carries out most governmental functions. For example, Kapitan Yap Ah Loy was both in 19th-century Kuala Lumpur.
Yap Ah Loy (Public domain)So, what is the real thin line between a government and a mafia or triad? That mafias or triads do not know how to employ a public relations company for legitimacy branding?
No. It is elections. It is the principle of "no taxation without representation", which ignited the American Revolution.
No mafia or triad will allow their subjects to elect their Godfather or Patriarch. You only have a duty to pay protection fees, but no right to elect your protector.
In a civilised world, a state must not be like a mafia or triad. That's why electoral processes and elected governments must not be subverted.
This month, when you pay your income tax, remember to cherish elections. Without elections, what you pay is only protection money.
The Godfather (© Paramount Pictures)
A political scientist by training and a journalism lecturer by trade, Wong Chin Huat is based in Monash University Sunway Campus. He hopes his home state will soon cease to be a kleptocracy propped up by unelected institutions. If democracy can only be restored with two more by-elections in Perak, he would appreciate any act of God.
ISA : Lima Tahanan warga Indonesia, GMI serah memorandum kepada Kedutaan Indonesia
ISA : Lima Tahanan warga Indonesia, GMI serah memorandum kepada Kedutaan Indonesia
Tuesday, 21 April 2009 • Kategori: Berita Semasa, Hak AsasiAmir Adzim
KUALA LUMPUR, 21 April (SK) : Gerakan Mansuhkan Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri (GMI) berkumpul di Kedutaan Indonesia bagi menghantar memorandum kepada Duta Indonesia berhubung penahanan lima rakyat Indonesia, di bawah Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri (ISA).
Salah seorang tahanan iaitu, Agus Salim dari Medan Indonesia, ditahan pada 5 Mac lalu di sebuah restoran di Larkin Johor ketika sedang bekerja tanpa sebarang alasan yang munasabah.
Memorandum ini adalah bertujuan memohon kerjasama daripada Kerajaan Indonesia supaya menuntut agar Kerajaan Malaysia membebaskan kesemua warganegara Indonesia yang sedang ditahan dibawah ISA di Malaysia.
GMI diwakili oleh Pengerusinya, Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh sementara Duta Indonesia mewakilkan setiausaha pertamanya, Slamet Nuegroho dan setiausaha keduanya Susapto Anggoro Broto.
Keluarga Agus diugut Polis
Menurut Syad Ibrahim, dua ahli keluarga Agus Salim juga diancam dan diugut supaya tidak bekerjasama dengan mana-mana pihak termasuk GMI.
“Selepas mereka bertemu dengan Agus Salim di Bukit Aman semalam, lebih kurang beberapa jam mereka sebenarnya telah di gertak bertubi-tubi oleh pihak polis dan seterusnya mengakibatkan mereka tidak mahu bersama dengan kami bertemu di Kedutaan Indonesia pagi ini,” tambah Syed Ibrahim lagi.
Beliau berkata, tindakan menggertak keluarga mangsa adalah satu tindakan yang bertentangan dengan hak asasi dan ini juga menunjukan seolah-olah kerajaan begitu takut untuk berhadapan dengan perkara ini.
“Jadi ini adalah satu pencabulan hak asasi manusia awal-awal lagi, bukan ditahan tapi seolah-olah macam ditahan dibawah ISA,” jelas Syed Ibrahim lagi.
Menurut seorang Ahli Jawatankuasa (AJK) GMI, Nashitah yang turut serta dalam perjumpaan keluarga Agus di Bukit Aman, kelakuan keluarga Agus jelas berubah selepas keluar dari melawat Agus.
“Ketika menghantar mak dan adik Agus di Bukit Aman, saya hanya tunggu diluar kerana tidak dibenarkan masuk. Lebih kurang satu jam lebih, adik lelaki Agus, Junaidi Salim keluar dengan ditemani seorang pegawai dari Unit Khas menju ke van saya. Saya memang nampak muka dia berubah seperti ketakutan,” kata Nashitah.
“Kemudian dia suruh saya bawa dia pulang kerumah sewanya untuk membawa baju kerana diarahkan pulang ke Johor Bharu oleh pihak polis. Tetapi saya pelik kerana maknya masih lagi ada di Bukit Aman,” tambah Nashitah.
Menurut Nashitah, dia kemudian cuba menghubungi beberapa peguam dan rakan-rakan untuk memberi tekanan kepada pihak polis bagi membebaskan mak Agus kerana ia jelas satu bentuk pencabulan hak asasi manusia menahan seseorang tanpa sebab.
Setelah memberi tekanan kepada pihak polis, akhirnya ibu Agus dilepaskan dan disuruh pulang ke Johor Bharu dengan segera.
Kejadian itu jelas tidak boleh diterima lebih-lebih lagi di Malaysia ini yang mengamalkan sistem demokrasi. Pihak polis secara terang-terangan mencabul hak asasi seseorang yang juga dari negara lain.
GMI walau bagaimanapun tidak akan mengaku kalah dan akan terus memberi tekanan kepada pihak kerajaan untuk membebaskan Agus dan juga empat tahanan yang lain.
Keempat-empat tahanan tersebut, Zainun Rasyid, Mahfudl Saifuddin dan Mulyadi juga dituduh terlibat dengan gerakan Jemaah Islamiyaah serta Ahmad Ghafar Shahril yang dituduh menganggotai Darul Islam.
Mengikut perancangan asal, GMI akan ditemani oleh keluarga Agus iaitu ibunya, Katem dan adik lelakinya, Junaidi namun mereka berdua tidak kelihatan kerana dikhabarkan sudah pulang ke Johor Bharu dengan tergesa-gesa keran bimbang diancam lagi.
Kini Baju PKR Tapi Jiwa Masih UMNO-azizi abdullah
Tidak boleh dinafikan, sebahagian besar ahli PKR, terutama yang berjawatan semuanya bekas ahli Umno. Mereka masuk PKR sama seperti Datuk Sri Anwar Ibrahim yang menubuhkan PKR: kerana tidak mahu lagi bersama Umno/BN dan ada pula yang masuk PKR kerana wawasan yang cukup jauh, duduk dalam Umno pun tak ada apa yang dapat kerana nama mereka dibalck list pasal sokong Anwar.
Datuk Sri Anwar meletakkan inti pati perjuangan menentang ketidak adilan, rasuah, reformasi tetapi yang lain kebanyakannya tidak terjerap pun tuntutan perjuangan ini. Di dalam Umno dulu kebanyakan bergantung kepada Datuk Sri Anwar, maka apabila tertubuhnya PKR, mereka mengharap apa yang dimiliki oleh Datuk Sri Anwar dalam Umno akan ada di dalam PKR.
Apa yang silapnya?
Yang silap ialah kerana mereka terus membawa bungkusan, galasan, fail-fail malah perlembagaan Umno masuk ke pejabat PKR. Mereka membawa akta dan peraturan bisnes, penswastaan, lesen kontraktor dan slogan korporat Umno; esok mau makan siapa?
Mereka melaung ‘Reformasi’ dan ‘Keadilan’.
Tetapi pernahkah anda terfikir dan mendapat tahu, selepas mereka (terutama yang berjawatan) memasuki PKR, mereka telah bersedia duduk bersila, berhimpit sesak dalam saf mendengar tuan guru membaca kitab-kitab tentang hubbuddunya, hablumminannas. Pernahkah anda dengar setiap minggu ada usrah dari naqib-naqib?
Dalam ertikata yang lain, mereka tidak ada kitab untuk dijadikan pegangan perjuangan, iaitu kitab seperti yang ditulis oleh Fathi Yakan “Kenapa Aku Memilih Islam” dan lain-lain. Ertinya dalam perjuangan PKR, tidak ada satu kitab rujukan “Kenapa Saya Masuk PKR?”
Saya menulis begini hanya sebagai satu tamsil dan ibarat sahaja. Dalam ertikata yang lain, seseorang yang ingin menyertai sesebuah parti politik, ia perlu ditanam pancang yang kuat.
Pas (bukan nak puji tak tentu hala) yang partinya berdasarkan kepada perjuangan Islam, menegak Islam, meletak Qur`an di atas, maka ahli-ahlinya terlebih dahulu mengenali Islam serta cabangnya sedikit sebanyak. Selepas itu barulah mereka masuk Pas.
Maka atas alasan ini kita jarang mendengar, walaupun badai taufan kebendaan, kemewahan yang ditawarkan kepada ahli-ahli Pas, jarang berlaku tunggang terbalik. Jarang malah hampir tidak ada Adun Pas yang boleh dibeli, letak jawatan atau lompat parti. Kelantan pernah berkuasa hanya dengan satu suara majoriti, tetapi orang lain tidak mampu memelompatklan seorang Adun tersebut.
Orang-orang PKR kenalah tanya, kenapa boleh jadi begitu? Ketika bersumpah hendak menjadi calon bertanding, wakil Pas dimestikan membuat perjanjian dengan sumpah, selain memberi bai`ah, taat kepada pemimpin, mereka diingatkan bahawa sepanjang mereka menjadi wakil mereka dilihat oleh Tuhan dan mereka adalah orang yang diberi amanah.
Apalah sangat dengan janji taat setia begitu? Sedangkan dalam mana-mana parti pun, perjanjian dan pengakuan seperti ini dibuat.
Bagaimana pun, perjanjian, pengakuan kedua-dua ini sangat berlainan. Pas ada roh janji setia berlandaskan Tuhan, keikhlasan, telus, amanah dan ini bukan menefesto, perlembagaan parti tetapi ia berasaskan taqwa. Orang yang tidak ada pancang taqwa ini tidak akan dapat menerima hakikat ini.
Maka kerana itu, saya memandang PKR, apa yang berlaku akhir-akhir ini, sama ada melompat, keluar dan letak jawatan, ia bukan berakhir dengan memilih orang lain bertanding. Ini masalah dalaman, masalah roh, masalah ketaqwaan.
DUN Penanti, bagi saya, letaklah siapa pun hal yang sama akan berulang. Datuk Zaharin bukan penyelesaian atau YB Malik bukan penyelesaian. Mereka sama seperti tokoh-tokoh yang lain, berakar umbi dari Umno dan apa yang berlaku kepada Fairus, bukan mustahil berlaku kepada juak-juak PKR yang lain.

Oleh kerana itu, Datuk Sri Anuar mestilah bertindak cepat. Beliau mestilah menubuhkan satu Jawatankuasa atau Majlis Ulama PKR. Wajibkan setiap pemimpin, YB-YB dan Jawatankuasa parti mengikuti kuliah, usrah dari Majlis Ulama. Tanamkan kepada mereka kewajipan berjuang, keikhlasan, kejujuran, ketelusan dan minta mereka belajar mengikis sekeping demi sekeping daki danur Umno yang ada di dalam diri mereka.
Cepat-cepatlah belajar dari Pas. Setiap AJK, pemimpin parti, Adun atau YB dimestikan mengikuti usrah bulanan. Di sana mereka akan ditarbiah secukupnya.
Kita bukan menuduh hal ini buta tuli. Kejadian di Bukit Selambau, di mana Manikumar di pilih menjadi calon, maka muncul bantahan-bantahan, kemudian sampai keluar parti.
Apa jadahnya hal seperti ini, kalau bukan kerana perjuangan hanya mahu pangkat dan kedudukan? Bukankah ini tidak ada tarbiah yang sepatutnya?
Adakah Pas jadi begitu. Minta dijauhkan Allah dari takbur. Di Kuala Terengganu atau di Bukit Gantang sepatutnya ada ahli Pas bangun berontak sebab yang terpilih mereka yang sudah jadi YB, tapi Alhamdulillah dengan kefahaman yang mereka miliki, dengan erti jihad, erti telus, erti jujur dan berjuang kerana Allah, tidak ada pun yang muncul berontak apa lagi yang keluar parti. Malah boikot jentera pun tidak.
Apa yang berlaku dalam PKR menggambarkan perjuangan mereka bukanlah satu perjuangan yang memiliki kelainan, malah mereka masih berjiwa Umno walaupun sudah lama berbaju PKR.
Sokongan rakyat sekarang Alhamdulillah. Tetapi ia bukan seratus peratus kepada PKR sebaliknya rakyat mahukan satu perubahan, satu alternatif dan perubahan atau alternatif itu ada pada PR. Mood rakyat sekarang bukan kepada BN maka apa saja yang ada untuk mereka memilihnya, mereka akan memilih bukan Umno/BN.
PKR perlu muhasabah tentang ini. Yang jujur dalam PKR hanya seorang saja, iaitu Datin Sri Wan Azizah yang sanggup melepas kawasan kepada Datuk Sri Anwar. Tapi itupun kerana Datuk Sri Anwar. Mungkinkah akan dilepas jika bukan Datuk Sri Anwar?
Apapun cara penyelesaian yang dibuat kepada bekas Adun Penanti itu tidak akan dapat menjamin PKR dari tidak berlaku lagi. Yang mesti dikutuk ialah kepada orang yang menikam Fairuz dari belakang dan orang-orang seperti inilah yang mesti ditarbiah secukupnya kerana orang seperti inilah berbaju PKR tetapi jiwa tetap Umno; Umno dalam konteks ini ialah sikap dan karenah, feel keUmnoan apabila berada di dalam PKR.
Di Pulau Pinang, maaf cakaplah kerana saya tidak belajar politik tinggi. Tetapi dalam telaah dan firasat, tak seorang pun dari kalangan pemimpin PKR boleh menjamin ia tidak akan berulang seperti apa yang berlaku kepada Fairuz. Ia akan berulang. Ia pasti berulang selagi jiwa mereka jiwa Umno.
Atas alasan apa telaah dan firasat ini?
Bacalah dan lihatlah lenggok lenggang, langkah-langkah, dongak dan senyum, gaya dan stail. Mereka masih 80% Umno hanya 20% sahaja PKR. Yang boleh bertahan pun kerana Lim Guang Eng duduk di atas.
Mahukah kita menerima kenyataan ini?
Kupasan Azizi Hj Abdullah dan pandangan beliau.Hak semua tak sama dan ini harus diterima.Mungkin ada yang suka dan tidak suka,namun harus kita ingat bahawa untuk menjaga parti agar tidak terkeluar dari landasan perjuangan, haruslah kita menerima kritikan.
Mungkin ramai ahli PKR sendiri di Permatang Pauh sedar akan hal sedemikian,Tanggungjawab menjaga parti dan juga perjuangan itu terlaku sukar.Jadi fikir-fikirkanlah....
PENANTI:JANGAN PANDANG MUDAH UNTUK PAKATAN RAKYAT
Harga yang perlu dibayar oleh Umno dan Pakatan terlalu tinggi untuk Penanti kali ini.Memang pada mulanya tanggapan Datuk Seri Najib ialah agar pakatan usah bertanding di Penanti.Mungkin dalam mencongak alasan tersebutlah maka beliau tidak mahu bertanding.Namun harus diingat dengan kuasa mengundi di tangan rakyat Penanti segalanya berkemungkinan jika dilihat kepada status dan statistik yang dipamerkan.Maka kerana itu Umno akan meletakkan calonnya di Penanti.Dengan desakan bayang-bayang Mahathir di sebalik tabir, sudah tentu Umno akan meletakkan calon nya.
Kenapa ianya dikatakan demikian.Jika dilihat kepada corak dan sokongan pengundi dikawasan ini ialah mereka mahukan anak tempatan dan berpendidikan.Soal jalanraya,air elektrik sudah tidak menjadi isu lagi.Ini Penanti hanya 30 minit untuk ke Georgetown dan bukan di Sabah atau Sarawak .Ramai yang terdidik dikawasan ini dan dapat menilainya.Maka calon yang perlu di ketengahkan oleh Pakatan ialah melingkungi kretiria seperti ini. Oleh yang demikian jika tiadanya ciri ini kemungkinan Pakatan Perlu bekerja lebih kuat harus di laksanakan.Bagaimana pula dengan Umno? jika muka yang itu-itu juga di letakkan maka ianya akan mengalami nasib sama yang lebih awal untuk dinilai keputusannya.
Satu lagi jika di bawa Mahathir berkempen di kawasan ini, maka hayat Umno juga akan diketahui juga akhirnya.Dato Najib harus hadir dan bukannya Mahathir. Mahathir hadir hanya mempercepatkan kekalahan yang bakal di alami Umno.
Maka kerana itulah semua harus menghayati PIAGAM RAKYAT dan DEKLARASI PERMATANG PAUH yang di lancar sejak septembar 1998 lalu.
The People’s Voice (PDF version )
The People’s Declaration (PDF version)
Piaggam Rakyat (PDF version)
Dato Seri Aanwar Ibrahim and Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail at Masjid Negara 1998
Bahasa Malaysia Translation: Deklarasi Permatang Pauh
Menyedari gesaan al-Quran yang bermaksud “tidaklah kami mahu melainkan untuk melakukan islah sekuat daya kami”;
Dan berilhamkan tradisi budaya-budaya Asia yang keseluruhannya menganjurkan pembaharuan diri dan masyarakat;
Dan menginsafi bahawa Malaysia kini dicengkam kemelut yang dahsyat dan memerlukan kekuatan dalaman untuk bangun semula;
Maka kami rakyat Malaysia yang berbilang bangsa dan agama bertekat untuk melancarkan gerakan reformasi yang menyeluruh:
* Gerakan reformasi yang terpancar perjuangan hati nurani, dari kesedaran bahawa sesungguhnya diri manusia itu mulia dan merdeka, mempunyai hak dan tanggungjawab, diri manusia haram dizalimi dan diaibkan, haram di belenggu dan disekat tanpa mengikut proses dan undang-undang yang adil;
* Gerakan reformasi untuk menegakkan keadilan untuk semua, yang kuat dan yang lemah, yang kaya dan yang miskin; membersihkan institusi dan proses undang-undang dari dicemari oleh penyalahgunaan kuasa dan rasuah;
* Gerakan reformasi untuk mendaulatkan kuasa rakyat melalui proses demokrasi. Democrasi itu satu kemestian, kerana semangat keadilan yang ada dalam diri manusia membolehkan demokrasi dilaksana, tetapi kecenderungan manusia untuk berlaku zalim menjadikan demokrasi satu kewajipan;
* Gerakan reformasi untuk memperjuangkan keadilan ekonomi, menjana pertumbuhan dan pengagihan yang saksama, jangan yang kaya bertambah kaya yang miskin papa kedana. Dunia ini mencukupi untuk keperluan semua, tetapi tidak mencukupi untuk memenuhi kerakusan individu;
* Gerakan reformasi untuk membanteras rasuah dan penyalahgunaan kuasa, mengikis manipulasi pasaran oleh segelintir golongan rakus dan mahakaya;
* Gerakan reformasi untuk memperkukuhkan jayadiri budaya yang dinamis, setia kepada warisan bangsa yang murni dan terbuka kepada segala yang baik dari semua budaya;
* Gerakan reformasi untuk membawa bangsa Malaysia ke zaman maklumat dan dunia tanpa sempadan, menjana kebijaksanaan, keyakinan dan keterbukaan untuk menjalin persahabatan sejagat berdasarkan prinsip kebenaran dan keadilan.
Kami akan menggerakkan reformasi ini dengan aman, mengikut semangat perlembagaan dan bernafaskan prinsip pemerintahan undang-undang.
Masanya telah tiba. Bersatulah untuk reformasi......reformasi.......reformasi...
KEKEJAMAN SEORANG PEMBANTU RUMAH
VIDEO INI MUNGKIN RAMAI YANG TERLEPAS PANDANG.DIAMBIL DARI LAMAN MARHAEN UNTUK TONTONAN SEMUA MASYARAKAT.IANYA SEKADAR MENGINGATKAN BAHAWA DALAM KITA BERBAIK-BAIK INILAH YANG KITA AKAN DAPAT.JANGAN MUDAH PERCAYA PEMBANTU INI.
TAK SEDAR DEK UNTUNG PEMBANTU RUMAH INI.DIHARAPKAN PIHAK BERWAJIB MENYIASAT TINDAKAN PEMBANTU RUMAH INI.
Malaysian ex-leader decries media coverage of PM

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — Former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad accused the international media Tuesday of trying to demonize Malaysia's new leader, who is battling opposition accusations of links to corruption and murder.
Mahathir's defense of Prime Minister Najib Razak reflects concerns within the ruling party that the leader's reputation has been tarnished because of unproven allegations by political adversaries.
Mahathir said many articles published in the Western media when Najib took power earlier this month were "anti-Najib stories" that highlighted the accusations against him.
"From France to Britain to Australia, the articles are identical and carried the same message," Mahathir wrote on his blog. "I cannot believe that this demonization by so many at the same time is a coincidence."
Mahathir — a strident critic of the Western media during his 22 years as prime minister before stepping down in 2003 — said Najib should brace himself for more foreign criticism, but added that it was ultimately with Malaysians "that Najib has to clear his name."
Mahathir holds no government post, but still commands wide respect and his views often receive attention from leaders and members of the ruling party.
The prime minister recently said he has been a victim of personal attacks in the media, referring to allegations by opposition leaders and bloggers that he was involved in a shady government contract to buy submarines from France.
He has also been accused of links to the murder of a Mongolian woman, who was the estranged lover of Najib's friend. He has denied the allegations.
Najib succeeded former Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who was pressured to retire after the ruling coalition retained power with its weakest parliamentary majority ever in March 2008 general elections.
SIAPA PERDANA MENTERI SEKARANG???

Review Federal Court’s decision immediately

Chief Justice of Malaya Tan Sr Zaki Azmi must do the nation a favour by ordering the Federal Court to review its decision concerning the suspension of BN Menteri Besar Zambry Abdul Kadir and his six executive councillors. This act of the CJ would be perceived by thinking Malaysians as doing national service. It is imperative that he heeds this earnest and urgent call and orders an immediate review.
The decision of the Federal Court was termed as “a perverse judgment” by none other than the much respected and highly regarded N H Chan, a former Court of Appeal judge. To the ordinary Malaysians it was a scandalous judgment that discredited the five judges and tarnished the judiciary beyond repair.
It is beyond anybody’s imagination how these five learned judges could have ignored and discarded the provisions of the Federal Constitution. N H Chan has referred to Article 72 which touches on the Privileges of Legislative Assembly. This is a very significant Article which had direct bearing to the case before the Federal Court and yet this was completely dismissed as inconsequential to the case.
These provisions confer certain rights and immunity to safeguard the sanctity of the Legislative Assembly which are spelt out very clearly. There is no ambiguity in what has been stated. Even laypersons have no difficulty in understanding these provisions:
72.Privileges of Legislative Assembly.
(1) The validity of any proceedings in the State Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court.
(2) No person shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him when taking part in proceedings of the Legislative Assembly of any State or of any committee thereof.
(3) No person shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything published by or under the authority of the Legislative Assembly of any State.
It is amazing that these five learned judges could have overlooked these very important provisions. And we have to ask, “Why?” If they are expected to dispense justice in a fair and impartial manner, shouldn’t they have paid attention to the supreme law of the country? We have every right to expect them to be thorough before delivering their judgment.
These five judges are responsible if Malaysians continue to be cynical and sceptical about our judiciary. And we have to wonder how many brave and honest judges are left in the judiciary who will respect the Federal Constitution and remain true to their conscience in delivering justice.
The CJ cannot remain unconcerned and unperturbed over what has taken place. He has to play his role as the guardian of the judiciary and salvage its reputation and restore people’s confidence in the rule of law.
P Ramakrishnan

KHIDMAT MASYARAKAT-MENCARI ANAK YANG HILANG





Mohon bantuan kepada sesiapa yang ada terjumpa anak
saudara saya Nurhidayah Binti Surip
(umur 11 tahun)
yang telah hilang dari Asrama Anak Yatim Darul Kifayah, Tmn Koop Polis, Gombak sejak hari Isnin 6 April
2009 .
Jika ada maklumat sila hubungi :
Abdul Razak Bin Salim
HEP Politeknik Johor Bahru
0177011038 / 0169326003
atau
.. juga saya mohon bantuan sebarkan maklumat kepada
rakan-rakan terutamanya di sekitar
KL
KHIDMAT MASYARAKAT-MENCARI ANAK YANG HILANG

SALAM SEJAHTERA DAN PENUH KETABAHAN..
HANYA ALLAH SAJER YANG DAPAT MEMBALAS SEGALA KEBAIKAN.
Kepada kawan-kawan yang lain..sekiranya ada apa2 pendapat atau cara atau sesiapa yang dikenali yang boleh membantu mencari FERIS...tolong lah saya...
Untuk pengetahuan semua, FERIS dah pandai cakap Melayu...
dah selalu ke surau ikut abang2 sepupunya...abang apan, ancik n zidane...
suka makan nasi lemak...suka cakap ..PHEDASSS la umie...
sebenarnya FERIS sedang belajar melaungkan azan dengan abg2 sepupunya..
dan lebih saya terkilan...feris baru 5 hari melangkahkan kaki ke alam
persekolahan pada usia 5 tahun 3 bulan..DAN SEKARANG FERIS dah tak ke sekolah lagi....
KESIAN FERIS...Saya rindukan feris..kami sekeluarga sangat rindukan feris...
Apatah lagi Umienya...Feris lah kawan karib elis ketika dalam apa pun keadaan..
Dan sekarang..bestfriend umie dah dibawa lari...
Kami tidak ada NAMA, TIDAK ADA KUASA DAN PANGKAT...yang membolehkan kami mengerah dan mengarah pihak tertentu mencarikan FERIS untuk kami...
Kami bukan artis atau selebriti glamor untuk mendapatkan ruang yang besar di dada2 surat khabar yang berpengaruh...
Kami tidak ada ORANG DALAM yang boleh bawa kami terus ke dalam TV3, RTM,
ASTRO, atau apa-apa lagi bahagian penyiaran yang lain..supaya dapat siarkan gambar2 FERIS kami...
Kami tidak ada abang2 atau saudara mara yang banyak paku pada baju..yang membolehkan kami mencari FERIS di pelusok tanah tumpah kami sendiri...
Dan yang paling sedih...kami tidak mampu MEMBELI undang2 supaya banyak pihak sama2 kami mencari FERIS...
Saya hanya ada KAWAN-KAWAN..
KAWAN-KAWAN yang sama2 rasakan deritanya KEHILANGAN ini..
TOLONGLAH CARIKAN FERIS UNTUK KAMI...TOLONG LAH...
KAMI MOHON ATAS NAMA AQIDAH DAN AGAMANYA.
terima kasih.
SALAM SEMANIS SENYUMAN FERIS.
ibu sayang FERIS.
mami sayang FERIS,
UMIE SANGAT SAYANG FERIS!!!
MOHON JUGA SEBARKAN KEPADA KAWAN-KAWAN YANG LAIN..
TERIMA KASIH.
Yuhaniza (Haniz)
Transport Dept
Integrated Logistics Solutions Sdn Bhd
Lot 4, Lebuh Sultan Muhammed 2,
Kaw 21, Bandar Sultan Suleiman,
42000 Port Klang, Selangor.
Tel : 603 3176 1004 (Ext: 2117)
Fax : 603 3176 0087
H/P :
Eml : yuhaniza@ilb.com.my
Web : http://www.ilb.com.my
--
Rock Will Never Die
__._,_.___
Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) Start a new topic
Messages
Disclaimer:-
The contents expressed in this YahooGroups are those of the person named and are not those of Mahligai. The person named on Mahligai has, as a condition of contributing to this YahooGroups, agreed to and hereby indemnifies Mahligai against all liability at law for the material contained therein.
Kandungan bahan-bahan yang termuat di dalam YahooGroups Mahligai ini adalah pendirian rasmi pemilik/pengirim bahan dan bukannya dari Pemilik dan Moderator Mahligai. Pengirim bahan bertanggung-jawap di atas mana-mana bahan yang didapati melanggar akta hakcipta tempatan atau antarabangsa. Pengirim bahan diminta mematuhi peraturan hakcipta sepenuhnya apabila menghantar mana-mana posting atau respons.
YahooGroups Mahligai tidak bertanggungjawab ke atas pencerobohan akta hakcipta.
*********************************************
Silakan forward email ini ke teman Anda, dan ajaklah mereka untuk turut menyertai Mahligai.
Sila hantarkan sumbangan anda ke alamat: mahligai@yahoogroups.com
Untuk melanggan secara percuma di Mahligai, sila hantarkan satu e-mail kosong ke alamat: mahligai-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Untuk berhenti menjadi ahli, hantarkan satu e-mail kosong ke alamat : mahligai-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use Unsubscribe
ALIRAN MEDIA STATEMENT
http://www.aliran.com
Ruling on Perak suspensions has far-reaching consequences
Aliran is terribly disappointed with the Federal Court’s ruling that the Speaker of the Perak State Assembly does not have the authority to suspend Zambry and his fellow exco members.
The ruling has far-reaching consequences for the democratic principle which respects the separation of powers of the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary.
The ruling has destroyed the notion that the separation of powers will be protected and preserved according to the rule of law by the Judiciary.
The Judiciary has once again failed the nation in upholding the rule of law in the interest of justice.
P Ramakrishnan
President
16 April 2009
REAKSI DAN KONTRA PERLETAKAN JAWATAN YB FAIRUS

Permatang Pauh- Reaksi dan kontra berhubung perletakkan jawatan Yb Mohd Fairus Khairuddin sebagai ADUN Penanti dan Juga semua jawatan dalam kerajaan negeri Pualau Pinang.Ramai yang tahu akan kelemhan dan juga seolah-olah beliau langsung tidak melakukan sebarang tugas sebagai Timbalan Ketua Menteri Pualau Pinang.
Pihak Kami mengemukakan beberapa sms yang beredar di kalangan ahli dan masyarakat Permatang Pauh yang menunjukkan seolah-olah satu protes akan dilakukan secara senyap terhadap parti tersebut.
Saah satu sms yang di terima pihak kami berbunyi begini.
Perjuangan 98" ..Kita diajar lawan korupsi,kronisma,Nipotisme, dan satu lagi konspirator.Kami tak lupa Mahzab ini....Keadilan Untuk FAIRUS"
Siapa yang menjadi dalang dan menulis dalam Alahai Fairus TKM1 sehingga kini belum pasti .Cuma ada beberapa pihak mendakwa DSAI telah mengetahui dalangnya kerana telah diberikan satu laporan lengkap dan menurut sumber lagi ianya melibatkan beberapa individu dalam parti.
Walau bagaimana pun,ianya adalah masalaah PKR dan kita menganggap bahawa ianya satu kelemahan dan masih gagal dibendung.Kita tahu DAP ada masalaah dalaman, PAS sedang dan akan juga bergolak dalam sedikit masa lagi , namun agak berbeza kerana PAS mengamalkan Syura iaitu dengan berunding dan DAP seolah-olah semacam PAS kerana parti ini telah lama menjadi pembangkang sejak azali walau PAS pernah tidur sebantal dengan Umno dan mimpi berlainan.
Oleh kerana menjadi pembangkang oposisi yang lama dalam negara, kedua-dua parri tersebut hampir berjaya menyelesaikan masalah dalaman yang dianggap boleh menjejaskan parti mereka dan tidak di londeh dikhalayak umum.Berlainan dngan apa yang sedang berlaku.Masyarakat seolah-olah menyalahkan orang lama dalam PKR kerana gagal membendung gejala ini walau telah lama mengetahui akan perkara ini.Ada yang menyatakan bahawa "tiada kuasa","masalah Fairus", malah ada pula yang "lepas tangan".
Kini ADUN Penanti akan menjadi medan sebenar bagi PKR menguji kesetiaan penyokongnya.Malah di dilihat dari rekodnya Penanti amat sensitif dengan kawasan mereka.Jatuh bangun UMNO dan oposisi dilihat sebagai trend bagi masyarakatnya.DSAI sendiri mungkin akan berkampung lama di kawasan ini bagi menangkis persoalan yang akan dibawa Umno.
Ramai yang kini mula merasa kecewa kerana dengan mengganggap Fairus hanya menghadapi situasi ini berseorangan dan pihak parti tidak mengindahkannya.Ramai pula yang menyatakan bahawa beliau tidak dengar cakap dan keras kepala.Namun alahai Fairus TKM1 berjaya menjatuhkan beliau dan ini kejayaan yang diluar jangka.Namun dalam masa yang sama, kini ramai pula yang mula bersimpati.Wanita Bahagian mula bertindak,pihak AMK sebahagiannya pula mula bertindak dengan persetujuan beberapa pemimpin peringkat penguruan PKR negeri.
Melihatkan kepada kegagalan perlantikan pengganti Yb Mohd Fairus, jelas DSAI sudah tahu secara mendalam akan situasi yang berlaku , dan khabarnya menunggu masa yang sesuai untuk bertindak melalui saluran parti.Jika Fairus menjadi mangsa ,pihak yang lain juga mungkin akan menjadi mangsa pula.Mungkin lebih mudah jika melantik 2 ahli berbangsa Melayu dalam PKR menjadi pengganti seperti YB Abdul Malek Kassim dan Yb Maktar dari Sungai Bakap.Namun dalam PKR apabila di tanya akan soalan ini ada yang menyatakan bahawa jika ingin melantik YB Abdul Malek, ianya telah lama dibuat oleh penasihat parti tersebut , dan YB ustz Maktar pula dilihat sebagai bukan pilihan dan mungkin sesuai untuk dilantik sebagai Exco.Namun peruntukan kerusi hanya 2 untuk Exco Melayu.Pertama sebagai Timbalan ketua Menteri dan Exco Agama dan beberapa potfolio lagi dalam kerajaan negeri dan juga peruntukan untuk Exco yang lain sebagaimana yang sedang di pikul YB Abdul Malek.
Namun, oleh kerana mungkin penasihat PKR mahukan calon yang sama di bawah Parlimen Permatan Pauh, maka kerana itulah ramai pula yang beranggapan bahawa Fairus "harus" dikorbankan demi melantik seorang calon TKM1 di Pulau Pinang.Maka kerana itu ada sms yang diterima lagi berhubung perkara ini ianya berbunyi
"Yb Fairus disuruh letak jawatan sertamerta.Bersiap untuk PRK di DUN Penanti.Clon PKR yang disebut menggantikan Fairus adalah Dr Mansor.Itulah KEADILAN".
Apa pun keadaan sudah menjadi bubur.Orang ramai di kampung-kampung mula menunding jari menyalahkan pihak yang menjatuhkan Fairus.Namun jika dikaji semula adakah benar laporan dalam Alahai fairus menjadi tekanan kepada beliau jika dilihat dari sudut yang lain.kenapa Fairus tidak menjadi sekental -kental seorang pahlawan yang punya semangat waja dalam jiwa beliau.Seharusnya lah pihak PKR mengambil tindakan awal dengan membendung dan berbincang.Ramai cerdik pandai dan juga ilmuan dalam parti dan tidak terbawa-bawa dengan semangat dalam parti yang kebanyakkan ahlinya meninggalkan parti nenek moyang mereka.Bagi kaum reformis yang tidak mendapat sebarang jawatan dan imbuhan melihat ini sebagai permulaan yang tidak begitu selesa untuk DUN Penanti.
Mengenai calon Dr mansor memang di kenali di Pulau Pinang,pernah berkhidmat di USM dan antara yang menformulakan TEKUN pada waktu itu dimana berjaya membantu kaum Melayu memulakan perniagaan.Namun Dr Mansor dilihat sebagai calon "Bad Luck" kerana sering tewas di tempat dimana beliau bertanding.mungkin Penanti ini akan menjadi medan bagi beliau menghapuskan kesan "tidak untung" yang di tanggung beliau.Ahli PKR harus menerima apa yang telah berlaku.Tidak meninggalkan parti walau dilihat ianya sukar buat permulaan.DSAI juga perlu bekerja keras memastikan orang DUN Penanti menyokong calon PKR.Ada lagi sms yang diterima dari ahli berbunyi seperti berikut
"Aku tak minat politik.Lain kali jangan sms pada aku lagi.Orang politik penipu.penat aku pangkah PKR.Ahli pelingkup parti"
Semua ni menunjukkan reaksi amarah.namun kita percaya DSAI ada penawarnya. Kita percaya penjelasan malam ini di Yayasan Aman akan menghilangkan semua teka teki yang bakal berlaku dihadapan kelak.Pihak kami akan cuba membawa live melalui COVER IT LIVE.Ruang berchating disamping menerima maklumat.Sila jenguk laman ini jam 9 malam nanti.
Fairus vows to expose dirt on PKR if it does not clear his name

See Hoh
Mohammad FairusKhairuddinPENANG (April 16, 2009) : Former Penang deputy chief minister Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin who has fallen from grace vows to dig up dirt on Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) and the Pakatan Rakyat state government if PKR does not clear his name in two weeks.
Fairus, who went into hiding after resigning the state's No. 2 post last month for allegedly being linked to illegal sand quarry activities, contacted Nanyang Siang Pau on Tuesday to convey this message and to clarify accusations made against him.
Speaking to a Nanyang reporter from Penang whom he trusted, the 33-year-old Penanti state assemblyman who claimed he was victimised by "his own people" said if PKR does not help him regain his reputation soon, he would not discount the possibility of calling for a media conference to tell all on PKR and the state government.
He said the expose concerns the inner workings of the PR and will have "far-reaching consequences".
He claimed it was because of his knowledge of PR's inner workings that they are hesitant to take action against him.
Fairus declined to reveal more and urged the reporter to be patient.
"I am innocent. They know what I can do. They must not force me (to do it)," he said, referring to those who victimised him.
He lamented that Selangor exco member Elizabeth Wong, former Kedah exco member V. Arumugam and himself are targets of victimisation, but unlike Wong and Arumugam, the party did not speak out for him or help clear his name.
"They are only exco members, while I am not only an exco member I am also the deputy chief minister, but they (the party) did not help me, because those who victimised me are 'my own people' from the party."
He said those who suggested that he go into hiding are also people from within the party, and their aim is to spare the party and de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim unnecessary attacks from detractors.
Fairus said he has yet to hear from the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission on (MACC) that it is charging him over allegations of corruption.
This is probably because it does not have enough evidence against him, he said, adding that he is ready to cooperate with MCAC in its investigation so that his name can be cleared.
Fairus said claims that he was under-performing and absent from government functions were part of a "well-planned scheme to victimise him".
He said outside talk of his lack of service to voters were played up by the media.
Truth is, he said, he has served them well and he is liked by all communities.
He said the lack of publicity, which he blamed on his aides, on what he has done for his constituency gave rise to the misconception that he was not doing his job.
