Trengganu MB crisis: Follow the money trail
I spent a couple of years in Trengganu when I was a kid. I have fond memories of a tranquil and rustic state, wonderful childhood neighbours - whom I have recently been reacqainted with after all these years - and family picnics at Pantai Chendering.
So the high stakes battle in Trengganu over the choice of Mentri Besar is of special interest to me.
While much has been said about the constitutional position, there is more to it than just the letter and spirit of the law.
There is more to it than that - and it is essential that we consider this dimension in any discussion of the political situation in Trengganu.
Follow the money trail.
One of the key issues, I believe, is how the Petronas oil royalties due to the state amounting to some RM1 billion annually should be spent - for the benefit of the people or for vested interests. Despite its oil wealth, Trengganu is one of the poorest states in the federation.
The royalty payments are no small change. In the past, the money was paid directly to the state government and dispensed under its supervision.
But when Trengganu fell to opposition hands (Pas) in 1999, then prime minister Mahathir changed the rules. He couldn’t bear to see all that money going to an opposition-controlled state government.
Instead of the Petronas royalties (amounting to 5 per cent of oil extraction and sales) going directly to the Trengganu state government, they were now channelled to a federally administered Special Fund Financing Programme (the Fund), which was established in December 2000. The money in this new Fund was euphemistically renamed “goodwill money” (wang ihsan) and it was supposed to directly finance development programmes for the people of Terengganu, largely bypassing the state government.
Since then, there has been little accountability over how this money has been spent and whether the projects really benefit the ordinary people.
The missing Accounts Committee
Basically, the Treasury is supposed to make allocations out of the Fund to various ministries (and via these ministries to federal agencies), financial institutions, and federal and state-level offices.
According to the Auditor General’s Report 2005, in line with a directive, the Treasury was supposed to create an Accounts Committee, chaired by the Treasury’s Chief Secretary, to administer the Fund. The Committee was supposed to comprise representatives from the Prime Minister’s Department (including the Economic Planning Unit), the Treasury, and the Finance Ministry.
But the Auditor General (AG) said then that such a Committee had not been set up – surely this must be of serious concern.
Instead, a “Central-level Committee”, which appears less high-powered, was formed. This Committee, which includes representatives from ministries and implementation agencies, meets twice a year to discuss and approve allocations. It is not clear who exactly is in this Committee. PM Abdullah must reveal the composition of this committee.
This Central-level Committee is supposed to evaluate projects and recommend to the Cabinet financial allocations for the various states. But the AG said he found that allocations for the various states were not decided during the Committee’s meetings. Instead, the “allocations were based on the approval of the Finance Minister and they were forwarded straight to the relevant state Menteris Besar”. The Finance Minister is of course the Prime Minister.
Would that explain why Abdullah Badawi is so keen on retaining Idris as MB?
In an article for Aliran Monthly, ‘Buying goodwill - RM4 billion worth of it’, I wrote back then that although the AG had said that the people had benefited from the Fund, his finding was not backed up by empirical evidence. He conceded that, at the state level, “expenditure that should not have been financed from the Special Fund allocation had occurred and this had more or less jeopardised the objective of the programme”.
He also found that not all ministries, departments and agencies had submitted their quarterly expenditure statements as required (though he said their monitoring work was adequate). This meant the Treasury’s records related to the Fund were incomplete. More seriously, there was no evidence to show that the Treasury had taken follow-up action. He also stressed that all allocations should be approved by the Central-level Committee.
Reading between the lines, it seemed to me, that there was a lot of arbitrary discretion being exercised as to how the fund was being administered – most likely to serve the interests of the ruling party while benefiting certain vested interests.
The best solution is to return the royalties to the state governments. High-powered independent audit committees with opposition representation, reporting to the respective state assemblies, should be set up to ensure that such funds are used on projects that really empower the rural poor. This will dispel the perception that this ‘goodwill money’ is being used as a patronage tool to boost political ‘goodwill’ for the Barisan Nasional while also benefiting vested interests.
I would hazard a guess that the Agong, who is the Sultan of Trengganu, knows what is going on and is deeply concerned.
Here’s one intriguing question: If a new MB who is not the PM’s choice is sworn in, would the files of yet another state government disappear?
Right now, it’s a battle of wills.
Even though Abdullah’s choice of MB has the backing of all the BN assembly members, would the weakened PM ram him through and risk having to face another state election in Trengganu? This time, Pas and PKR, fresh from their successes on the west coast, could well pose a stronger challenge.
UMNO BACA NI DAN FAHAM INI
Menurut Perkara 32(1) Perlembagaan Persekutuan mestilah ada seorang Ketua Negara Persekutuan yang digelar Yang di-Pertuan Agong. Baginda mengatasi semua orang dalam Persekutuan dan yang tidak boleh didakwa dalam mana-mana mahkamah kecuali Mahkamah Khas yang ditubuhkan di bawah Bahagian 15 (Perkara 182 dan 183). Selepas baginda, Perlembagaan juga memperuntukkan bahawa Raja Permaisuri Agong hendaklah menduduki tempat kedua iaitu selepas Yang di-Pertuan Agong.
Seri Paduka Baginda Al-Wathiqu Billah Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin Ibni Al-Marhum Sultan Mahmud Al-Muktafi Billah Shah mengangkat keris kerajaan sempena Majlis Pertabalan sebagai Yang di-Pertuan Agong XIII pada 26 April 2007 di Istana Negara.
Sumber : Perpustakaan Foto, Jabatan Perkhidmatan Penerangan Malaysia
Sebagai Ketua Negara, baginda mempunyai bidang kuasa yang luas seperti yang dikanunkan dalam Perlembagaan. Baginda juga mempunyai peranan dan fungsi dalam tiga cabang Kerajaan iaitu Eksekutif, Perundangan dan Kehakiman.
Kedudukan dan Kuasa Yang di-Pertuan Agong
Kedudukan Seri Paduka Baginda dalam Senarai Keutamaan Persekutuan
Fungsi Eksekutif (Perkara 39)
Fungsi Perundangan (Perkara 44)
Fungsi Kehakiman
Lain-Lain Tugas Penting Yang di-Pertuan Agong
Perlantikan Jawatan-Jawatan Penting
Perkara-Perkara yang Tidak Boleh Dibuat oleh Yang di-Pertuan Agong
Penaung
Sistem Monarki Malaysia Kuasa Diraja Seri Paduka Baginda Alat Kebesaran Diraja
Adat Istiadat Diraja Istana Negara Darjah Kebesaran Persekutuan Istana Negara Istana Melawati
Uji Minda Bingkisan Laman Bicara Hebahan Modul Pembelajaran
Glosari Bibliografi Penghargaan
©2003 Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.
Tidak dibenarkan menyalin keseluruhan atau sebahagian kandungan portal initanpa kebenaran bertulis Ketua Pengarah, Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.
PAK LAH DAN SELURUH AHLI UMNO HARUS MENDUKUNG PRINSIP INI.
RUKUN NEGARA
BAHAWASANYA negara kita Malaysia mendukung cita-cita untuk mencapai perpaduan yang lebih erat di kalangan seluruh masyarakatnya; memelihara satu cara hidup demokratik; mencipta masyarakat yang adil bagi kemakmuran negara yang akan dapat dinikmati bersama secara adil dan saksama; menjamin satu cara yang liberal terhadap tradisi kebudayaannya yang kaya dan berbagai-bagai corak; membina satu masyarakat progesif yang akan menggunakan sains dan teknologi moden;MAKA KAMI, rakyat Malaysia, berikrar akan menumpukan seluruh tenaga dan usaha kami untuk mencapai cita-cita tersebut berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip yang berikut:
KEPERCAYAAN KEPADA TUHAN
KESETIAAN KEPADA RAJA DAN NEGARA
KELUHURAN PERLEMBAGAAN
KEDAULATAN UNDANG-UNDANG
KESOPANAN DAN KESUSILAAN
Nota: AKU harap SEMUA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BAIK DALAM ATAU LUAR NEGARA harus faham dan tahu dokumen di atas dan kirimkan kepada seluruh pihak yang terbukti sedang menderhaka kepada Raja-Raja Melayu pada ketika ini. DAULAT TUANKU, DAULAT TUANKU, DAULAT TUANKU!